Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« BATF manager ... uh... just read the story | Main | Guns in checked train baggage »

Followup on Maricopa County case

Posted by David Hardy · 9 December 2009 10:24 PM

The case involving the deputy who read over and grabbed the defense attorney's papers gets stranger by the moment, even allowing that the county attorney up there and the sheriff are reputedly, well, nuts.

As noted earlier, the judge held the deputy in contempt. Now the county attorney has filed felony charges against the judge. On a quick read they are pretty strange. For one thing, they are quite ambiguous. The judge provided "money, transportation, weapon or disguise or other means of avoiding discovery, apprehension, prosecution of conviction" to any judges, officials, or attorneys (only two being named).

For another, look at the verification. "Subscribed and sworn upon information and belief this 9th day of December 2009" .... and there is no signature of a notary. Then it has the judge's home address.

BTW, the defendant is the chief criminal judge of the county.

At the end is the explanation. Cripes ... the judge apparently denied the county's motion to recuse himself, and county lost an appeal. Then he failed to hold someone in contempt that the county thought should be held in contempt. And he responded to claims that the sheriffs' office didn't have enough manpower to transport people to court for bail-setting hearings (meaning people remained in jail without necessity) by suggesting that if the number of inmates was reduced this would cease to be a problem.

I have trouble reading further. This suggests a remarkable assault on the judiciary by the executive branch. Rule our way or face prosecution! I hope the judge files a 1983 action and puts a few wingnuts in their place.

18 Comments | Leave a comment

Thane Eichenauer | December 9, 2009 11:30 PM | Reply

All I can say is that regardless of which Maricopa County government functionary we are talking about I am hoping that one of them gets sent to jail soon because from what I can figure I think this is all one giant knot that can't be cut until election day 2012 (or retention day 2010) if that. All these indictments and suits will benefit few save for the lawyers who engage in this drama.

It's been two years since the Sheriff had Mike Lacey and Jim Larkin (with the Phoenix New Times) arrested and nothing notable has happened on that lawsuit come two full years later.

Thane Eichenauer
I live in Maricopa County - woo hoo!

Gene Hoffman | December 10, 2009 12:22 AM | Reply

I think Sheriff Joe will look good being escorted by US Marshals.

Attacking judges has the pretty obvious downside of eventually getting to a judge you can't attack who doesn't take kindly to attacks on his brethren...

-Gene

straightarrow | December 10, 2009 12:43 AM | Reply

It simply is time to remove sheriff Joe and the prosecutor at gunpoint from their offices and place them in the federal penetentiary at Florence until they can be tried in Federal Court.

The governor must be a really weak reed to allow this crap to continue. Or perhaps he has skeletons that are known to Joe and Stupid. My bet is skeletons.

straightarrow | December 10, 2009 12:44 AM | Reply

Can't help but wonder if they caught him in bed with a dead girl or a live boy.

Letalis Maximus, Esq. | December 10, 2009 4:21 AM | Reply

The judges will take of themselves on this one.

Letalis Maximus, Esq. | December 10, 2009 4:23 AM | Reply

The Judge's employer is "UNKNOWN"?

That seems kinda sloppy.

Jim | December 10, 2009 5:18 AM | Reply

This is like watching a train wreck...

Kman | December 10, 2009 5:46 AM | Reply

These people all swore to uphold the law...

AvgJoe | December 10, 2009 7:02 AM | Reply

Is it more clear that AZ has full blown lunatics running that government. That state repeatedly contacted me to move my business there. I would love to beat the winters in Idaho but something just didn't feel right and now I'm more glad I didn't take them up on it. Who on earth wants to live with such lunacy and be forced to pay for it.

Assman | December 10, 2009 10:52 AM | Reply

This is totally bizarre.

jnheath | December 10, 2009 11:29 AM | Reply

Fascinating. A a pissing match (can I say that here?) between two branches that have discretion to act and sovereign immunity. It's like a fight between Superman and Wolverine.

The criminal discovery process should be spectacular.

Flighterdoc | December 10, 2009 12:11 PM | Reply

I can't believe that this is going anywhere good for the DA, or Sheriff Joe...

I've always been willing to give Joe a pass, even when I lived in Az. Time for him to move to Sun City and retire, for good.

GMC70 | December 10, 2009 12:13 PM | Reply

David -

Keep us posted of developments in this little adventure. Looks like it will be fun to watch.

I can't imagine what that deputy thought he was doing in the first place. The rest has been surreal. Like Jerry Springer, with better clothes.

Flighterdoc | December 10, 2009 1:44 PM | Reply

It's a shame the Sheriffs tried to double-down. This all could have gone away with a simple whoopsie....

jdberger | December 10, 2009 4:06 PM | Reply

I'm thinking that Sherriff Joe pushed this one too far.

Just wondering, if they arrest him, will they hold him in Tent City?

(Thane - you probably don't remember me but I used to hang out with your sister back in the mid 90's in Scottsdale. Small world).

Jim W | December 11, 2009 1:50 AM | Reply

Holy shit, this blows my mind.

Jim D. | December 11, 2009 9:35 PM | Reply

Sounds like "red on red".

The Little Coach | December 14, 2009 11:52 AM | Reply

The beginning of the end for Big Jim Garrison was when he took on the New Orleans judges personally and found himself getting hammered by SCOTUS. Could be similar overreaching in the desert?

Leave a comment