Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Ft. Hood: "wishing he too had a gun" | Main | Judge rules in favor of Students for Concealed Carry »

Strange events in a Phoenix courtroom

Posted by David Hardy · 7 November 2009 11:46 AM

Caught by the security cam. While a criminal defense attorney argues a motion, a detention officer rifles thru her papers behind her back, takes one, and gives it to another officer. Here's another story.

Hat tip to Tavis Steen and Paul Huebl...

· General con law

4 Comments | Leave a comment

Flighterdoc | November 7, 2009 3:43 PM | Reply

And the judge tolerates this?

What ever happened to attorney-client privilege? And Arpaio's comment was BS: The document was in the possession of the attorney.

W. W Woodward | November 7, 2009 8:38 PM | Reply

Rifling an attorney's papers in a courtroom setting is three steps the other side of idiotic. The deputy's brain must have been in reverse when he engaged his body. The video tape shows without question that the paper the deputy removed from the stack couldn't possibly have been subject to the plain sight doctrine. In the absence of a warrant, the deputy's search of the defense attorney's paper was totally unreasonable.

AvgJoe | November 7, 2009 9:57 PM | Reply

Guess who the deputy's boss is? Lets see of old guts and glory is going to do the right thing about this criminal deputy he's got on the payroll.

The Mechanic | November 8, 2009 7:39 PM | Reply

Oh no, Joe! Say it ain't so!

Leave a comment