Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Ill. ruling on guns in cars | Main | Nifty device for shooting ranges »

Gallup poll shows MAJOR shifts

Posted by David Hardy · 9 October 2009 01:21 PM

Story here.

1990 vs 2009:

Gun laws should be stricter: in 1990, 78%, fell to 44% today.
Gun laws should stay the same: 17%, now 43%.
Gun laws should be relaxed: 2%, rising to 12% today.

Now, some of the shift could theoretically come from enactment of background checks, etc., during the 1990s, which made the 1990 population segment satisfied. But it doesn't look like that. When asked about handgun bans, 60% approved in 1990, but only 28% in 2009, a drop of 32 points. That matches the 34 point drop in gun laws should be more strict, and suggests that a lot of Americans who supported gun restriction as a concept in 1990 stopped supporting it by 2009.

9 Comments | Leave a comment

RKV | October 9, 2009 1:29 PM | Reply

What? No gun laws are unconstitutional category? But seriously Dave, as glad as I am for the progress, we're no where near where the plain meaning of the Constitutional text is at. Not. Even. Close. Oh well, more work to be done. Thanks for your contributions to the battle.

jheath | October 9, 2009 1:49 PM | Reply

I'd be surprised if a meaningful percentage had even a vague notion as to what current gun laws are or how they've changed since 1990. A small number might guess correctly that violent crime numbers have dropped. But I suspect the shift is because the issue has been gradually back-burnered by Dem pols and MSM since '96 because it was costing the Dems more than the Repubs. What we're seeing may be the effect of the public exposed to less rhetoric. Akin to the change in tone on Iraq now that Pres. Obama owns it.

Kevin P. | October 9, 2009 5:58 PM | Reply

My theory: The steady trend correlates with the beginning and growth of the Internet. It has enabled gun owners to network, associate and bypass the traditional media who are pro-gun control.

Letalis Maximus, Esq. | October 9, 2009 6:56 PM | Reply

CCW reform has had a huge impact on popular opinions about handguns. Which is actually why the gun banners fought them, and continue to fight them, so hard. See, once it becomes evident to Sally Soccertwaught that law abiding citizens carrying handguns are not adding to the crime stats, and may in fact be helping cut crime, the nonsense they were spoon fed by the anti-gun media begins to fade.

denton | October 9, 2009 8:17 PM | Reply

One simple and appealing explanation is that we are winning the debate.

Maxpwr | October 10, 2009 10:21 AM | Reply

I think one of the reasons we are winning is that our side didn't give in but stood up and fight. Say what you want about the NRA, but under Wayne and Charlton, the NRA really put up a strong fight during the 1990s. Standing up to Clinton, CNN, and every other person or organization that spreads outright lies about guns.

Ben | October 10, 2009 12:55 PM | Reply

No doubt we are winning the fight. Under Wayne, the NRA sure did a good job. I am proud of both Wayne and Charlton.

doug in colorado | October 11, 2009 9:19 AM | Reply

It's likely more a case of everyone moving a notch toward one side on the spectrum than that the hard-over hoplophobes suddenly saw the light...they may have moderated one notch or two, on the spectrum but surely haven't completely renounced gun control.

JJR | October 13, 2009 9:01 AM | Reply

I am one who was in the NRA as a teenager, and involved in NJROTC and considered myself a moderate Republican, but I was also always an atheist. When Bush Sr. embraced the Religious Right in 1992, I said to myself "well, I guess I'm a Democrat now."; I guess I adopted an anti-gun mentality back then as part of the whole package, without really examining it. When I lost my college NROTC scholarship to a physical disqualification (eyesight), I was pretty bitter; turned into a grad school hippie for a time. It took the aftermath of 9/11 for me to wake up and re-examine gun-rights and the 2nd Amendment and decide the anti- position was full of sh*t. Renewed my long dormant NRA membership and joined my state rifle association as well. I'm a political independent now.

Leave a comment