Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Chicago cases up early | Main | Win for shooting ranges under RCRA »

Nordyke ready to go

Posted by David Hardy · 22 August 2009 11:00 AM

Oral argument en banc, in Nordyke v. King is set for 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, September 24, 2009, in Courtroom One at the James R. Browning Courthouse, located at 95 Seventh Street in San Francisco.

UPDATE: I think it's 9th Circuit custom to reveal names of a panel, but only very close to argument -- 1-2-3 days, that manner of thing. Here it could make a big difference. In most circuits, en banc hearing means every active (non-senior status) judge in the circuit. Due to the size of the 9th, its form of en banc consists of the Chief Judge (who is quite pro right to arms) and ten out of 20+ judges, chosen at random. The Circuit also is sharply divided, with staunch defenders of and detractors of the right to arms.

· Nordyke v. King

7 Comments | Leave a comment

CDR D | August 22, 2009 5:38 PM | Reply

Do we know who the ten judges (plus Kozinski) making up the panel are?

I realize the odds aren't very good in this circuit for a group sympathetic to our side.

Spook | August 23, 2009 10:14 AM | Reply

Waiting for results of 2010 Election. In meantime, all patriots need to read, "Unintended Consequences" by John Ross. It's a big read but worth it. Then reflect on your position, status and access as to how you may contribute to returning our Constitutional Democratic Republic to it's founding principles and rid D.C. of the inbedded progressive Facists criminals now occupying it.

The judicial system also needs serious purging.

There's no place for CZARS in America, they need to be removed from the gene pool.

The hogs are hungry!

Carl in Chicago | August 24, 2009 4:22 PM | Reply

SPOOK ... off-topic much?


CDR, I doubt panel identity will be public before the orals.

jdberger | August 25, 2009 10:35 AM | Reply

As we did before, Californians interested in this hearing are invited to attend. We request that you wear a jacket and tie (last time the only person wearing a t-shirt was from the Brady Campaign).

Further events are in the planning stages (like Dinner) and will be announced on Calguns.net.

Please join us.

Anonymous | August 25, 2009 1:56 PM | Reply

Ha. The "Browning" courthouse. I know its not the same guy, but it still got a snort out of me.

Ride Fast | August 27, 2009 8:07 AM | Reply

[...] Nordyke en banc hearing set [...]

J Richardson | August 27, 2009 8:09 AM | Reply

Too bad it wasn't the John M. Browning courthouse built in 1911.

Leave a comment