Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Insider thoughts on piracy and arming crews | Main | Thoughts on crime »

Suicide in DC

Posted by David Hardy · 30 April 2009 12:48 PM

Say Uncle notes a sad irony.

UPDATE: While doing oneself in is an overreaction to a layoff under any circumstances, I can guess at a context. He's head of the Supreme Court appellate section in a major DC law firm, so he's surely a partner or shareholder. I don't know how those sort of firms are set up, but odds are that "firing" a person in that status requires an extraordinary event... everyone agreeing to those rules knows that they could be used to fire themselves, too.

Odds are that there were some very nasty meetings, in which some very unpleasant things were said, and this being DC, he discovered that a lot of people he'd figured were friends were willing (when their own bottom line was the issue) to pitch him and the others over the side. Likely something like "you can take a 25% cut in your staggering pay, or knife these guys in the back." Or even "if he doesn't go, you might go, so form an alliance that screws him and lets you stay on." This might make things more understandable than if we treat it as he got laid off and did himself in.

15 Comments | Leave a comment

Don Hamrick | April 30, 2009 4:04 PM | Reply

(Hate to portray myself as a cold heart cynic) But, Whew! For a moment there I thought it was the good Robert Levy of the Cato Institute. But it was Mark Levy, the one who argued on behalf of the Clinton Department of Justice for the Brady Bill that required waiting periods and background checks on the purchase of handguns.

I presume it was the liberal 9th Circuit's opinion in the Nordyke v. King case that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Second Amendment shattered his delusion and so no escape to the coming reality of openly armed citizens every that pushed him over the edge. Such devotion of a failed political ideology. Who's next? I wonder.


Don Hamrick | April 30, 2009 4:09 PM | Reply

OOH! I know who might be next to voluntarily step out of the gene pool! Justice Stevens for his dissenting opinion in the Heller case.

Don Hamrick | April 30, 2009 4:13 PM | Reply

"Git-R-Done!"

"I don't care who ya are, that's funny right there"

"That ain't right. Lord I apologize for that right there and be with the starving pygmies down there in New Guinea there, Amen."

happycynic | April 30, 2009 4:30 PM | Reply

I find it interesting that it came on the heels of the layoff announcement. I suspect that he wasn't part of the layoff itself, but that he had been told that he needed to find a new job or retire. Someone with his stature is usually shoved out the door quite gently, but shoved nonetheless. Many lawyers in general, and baby boom lawyers in particular define themselves by their careers. Failing like this could simply have been more than he could bear. Anyways, that's my speculation on the deal.

God bless his family and friends at this time.

Nathan Cognito, Esq. | April 30, 2009 5:20 PM | Reply

Actually, the layoffs may, *may* have to do with the 20 or so million dollars the firm has sunk into a certain case they filed against a certain federal agency. A case that has turned out to be, well, lets just say it will not as profitable as it was once expected to be.

The case was going real well until the plaintiffs lost what some considered to be their primary attorney - the judge in the case. Since then it has been going steadily downhill for them.

Anonymous | April 30, 2009 5:40 PM | Reply

Anyone care to speculate on whether the litigious war on the Second Amendment is in full retreat and near a truce?

periwinkle | April 30, 2009 7:50 PM | Reply

Another source is saying that he was one of the 24 layoffs. This is tragic, all the way around and in every aspect. That said, one wonders about the intestinal fortitude of a man with a Yale law degree, many years of excellent experience, and MANY big connections who would see suicide as a response to a layoff.

anon | April 30, 2009 8:15 PM | Reply

Thank you, Mr. Hardy, for the additional insight. I feel for his family and friends. Personally, I think I'd hang around to, if nothing else, plot my revenge.


Affe | May 1, 2009 7:40 AM | Reply

... and this story, boys and girls, is why identifying wholeheartedly with your job, and devoting yourself to it body and soul, as more and more law firms demand, can truly be the road to perdition.

emdfl | May 1, 2009 9:24 AM | Reply

A DC law firm eating its own. What's not to like?
Is that too cold?

fwb | May 1, 2009 10:23 AM | Reply

May daily mantra to my bosses is:

Fire me! Fire me, NOW!

They just won't let me go. But then I have enough time in to retire, my truck has fishing, camping, and hunting gear at the ready, and the lakes have been stocked.

Tiochfaidh ar la!

Don Hamrick | May 1, 2009 12:29 PM | Reply

House (TV Doctor show) had an episode with one of his own team committed suicide.

Maybe Boston Legal will do a "public issue" episode on suicide in the law firm. Dare the link the U.S. Supreme Court and the Second Amendment development from the 9th Circuit?

straightarrow | May 1, 2009 7:17 PM | Reply

Let's see here. He had no loyalty to liberty or the consitution, nor did his firm, so you think it might be possible that lack of loyalty to himself surprised and depressed him enough to commit suicide? Nawww. I don't think so.

Hell, he didn't even have loyalty to his clients, he killed himself with an illegally possessed gun.

I vote for more guilt than he could carry. (probably not so,as that type don't often have enough conscience to feel guilt)

I am sorry for his family. Can't extend it to him.

Joe | May 1, 2009 9:43 PM | Reply

Interesting the number of "friends of Bill" who come to very violent ends......

Pro 2A Leftist | May 2, 2009 12:09 AM | Reply

"Interesting the number of "friends of Bill" who come to very violent ends......"


Interesting, but by no means surprising. As Everyone knows "Slick Willy" was/is up to his eyebrows in organized crime and/or the C.I.A.

Leave a comment