Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.3
Site Design by Sekimori

« Roger Barnett case verdict | Main | Send a reader to Australia! »

Little more on Roger Barnett case

Posted by David Hardy · 18 February 2009 09:34 AM

Here's the Washington Times story on the verdict. The reporter mentioned that his first story on the case got 2.5 million hits and generated 1500 emails, virtually all supportive.

Roger and I will be on Fox New's Glenn Beck show today at 5:30 Eastern. Right now I'm slowly working thru 50+ voicemails and 100+ emails that piled up during the trial.

6 Comments | Leave a comment

AvgJoe | February 18, 2009 1:15 PM | Reply

I know that area well, and know about the illegals movement through that area. Years ago they used to come up to Tucson from around Ruby, and old mining town down by the border.
I don't see how this case made it as far as it did and to think they awarded criminals with money.

bill-tb | February 18, 2009 1:19 PM | Reply

This is indeed a travesty to penalize another for trying to uphold the law.


What would anyone do with a burglar?

Kristopher | February 18, 2009 2:17 PM | Reply

Avgjoe: It went this far because, as I understand it, the MALDEF a-holes went to the 9th fed court on civil rights grounds ( which they then lost, BTW ).

If they had been dumb enough to take this to an AZ court they would have been horsewhipped.

Ben Kalafut | February 19, 2009 1:12 AM | Reply

I'm surprised that in the age of Google the reporter received such a positive response. Or perhaps I should be dismayed. Justice may have been served today, but this is the same Roger Barnett who came damn close to murdering Ron Morales for hunting while Mexican-American and daring to point out, using a map and logic, that he's on state trust land. A real ticking time bomb, and one who doesn't do responsible gun owners a bit of good.

Jim | February 19, 2009 2:29 PM | Reply

If this had happened in Texas, couldn't he have just shot them?

Jon | February 23, 2009 7:28 AM | Reply

This is only the beginning.

Long Live Operation Janus

Leave a comment