Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Testimony on NFA database | Main | DC adds to its gun law »

Oklahoma move to repeal sales tax on firearms

Posted by David Hardy · 16 December 2008 10:17 AM

Story here. Note a sales tax on firearms isn't a real constitutional difficulty: you can have a nondiscriminatory sales tax on things related to the First Amendment (TVs, radios, and even newspapers although I haven't encountered a jurisdiction that taxes the last). I do think there is a problem with places that impose significant costs on firearms permits just for the sake of making them expensive, and unrelated to any real processing cost. A government can charge for a parade permit, but can't arbitrarily charge $500.

Hat tip to reader Ambiguous Ambiguae...

· State legislation

8 Comments | Leave a comment

Dave Dudley | December 16, 2008 12:31 PM | Reply

...I believe California charges sales tax on newspapers.

Scott | December 16, 2008 12:39 PM | Reply

There is some precedent in not taxing materials used in exercising a fundamental right: Minneapolis Star vs. Minnesota (1983).

Some of the taxes collected on ammunition go to parks via the Pittman-Robertson Excise Tax.

Michael | December 16, 2008 1:02 PM | Reply

I've been wondering whether once Heller is incorporated in California those of us who have paid the $35 "Dealer Record of Sale" fee to the state will be able to claim a refund on the grounds it is unconstitutional.

fwb | December 16, 2008 1:42 PM | Reply

If one studies the legitimacy of taxes, one learns that the power to tax is egitimately a revenue power only. Thus the only proper tax is one which derives its existence solely from generating revenue.

The revenue/tax rate curve is convex having some maximum. The maximum is the dividing point between a legitimate tax that generates revenue and an illegitimate tax that is used to restrict consumption or otherwise control purchasing. While a tax rate above the maximum may generate the same total revenue as a tax rate below the maximum, the higher tax does so at the expense of the consumer(greater per item cost than is necessary, reduced consumption which often is associated with higher production costs). By acting to reduce consumption, the tax at the higher rate becomes more than a revenue generation action and is illegitimate.

David McCleary | December 16, 2008 2:22 PM | Reply

Given FWB's comment it might be difficult to justify the NFA transfer tax?

fwb | December 16, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply

Of course it is difficult. But even if one gives the government the benefit of the doubt and allows that the tax rate is not a rate that reduces consumption, there is still the following.

Te NFA transfer tax infringes on the Right to keep and bear Arms. The 2nd amendment being latter law circumscribes ALL prior law includng taxation, commerce control, etc. Normally latter law is recognized as overriding prior law that is in conflict with the latter law but no. The SC reverses the concept when it comes to Rights in latter law and governmental powers in prior law.

Total bovine excrement!

bill-tb | December 16, 2008 4:40 PM | Reply

So how about those Internet connection taxes ...

Philip Dalrymple | December 17, 2008 4:31 AM | Reply

GA does tax newspapers, at least at stores (not from boxes I think). The Atlanta J & C sets the price to make it look like there is no tax.

Leave a comment