Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Interesting approach by OR sheriff | Main | LA Times shows its understanding and impartiality »

Debate: do guns keep you safe?

Posted by David Hardy · 11 November 2008 08:40 AM

A debate at Opposing Views. Opposing Views is an interesting concept. They take public issues, solicit arguments from spokesmen on either side (here, NRA, GoA and Citizens' Committee vs. Ceasefire and Freedom States Alliance, then open the debate to comments.

4 Comments | Leave a comment

jon | November 11, 2008 2:18 PM | Reply

i commented on this extensively on david codrea's blog. the short version is:

the question is 100% weasel-worded.

how the antis frame the question: does getting a gun, when before you did not have one, make you more safe in and of itself? the answer is no, of course not, you haven't taught yourself how to use it yet.

what the question really ought to be: what's the most effective means of securing my safety and the safety of my loved ones and household and property in as many situations as possible? get a gun -- and as is implied by such a direct statement, learn how to use it.

Linoge | November 11, 2008 4:37 PM | Reply

I agree - the entire debate is flawed due to the inherently flawed nature of the question. The firearm does nothing - if I bought a NASCAR car, it would neither make me a race car driver or not.

DirtCrashr | November 11, 2008 4:49 PM | Reply

More appropriately the question should be, "Do you keep your guns in a safe?"

Windy Wilson | November 12, 2008 4:13 PM | Reply

"More appropriately the question should be, 'Do you keep your guns in a safe?'"
Why? nothing is more effective than a gun in the hands of the intended victim in the prevention of rape, kidnapping, robbery or murder. You might as well ask if one keeps one's fire extinguishers in a safe, as there is the potential for fatal misuse of them, too.

The thought that violence might prevent other violence is a lost subtlety, no?

The real issue to be examined is whether the belief that you are armed keeps bad guys from trying to rob or kill you.

Leave a comment