Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Election getting foul already | Main | ATFE authorizes electronic A&D books »

Court considering rebriefing death penalty case

Posted by David Hardy · 9 September 2008 09:55 AM

Discussion at the Volokh Conspiracy. It concerns Kennedy v. Louisiana, where the Court ruled that the death penalty for child rapists was cruel and unusual punishment, based in good part on finding a national consensus that it was too much. The majority noted that there was no federal law allowing such punishment, and only 6 of 30 States that have the death penalty allowed it, and mentioned that Congress, in establishing a federal death penalty, had not extended it to rapists of children.

The problem was that there was a federal (military code) provision for just that penalty, which neither side found or briefed. Ooops.

· General con law

4 Comments | Leave a comment

Deavis | September 9, 2008 10:58 AM | Reply

I don't get it. If the State chooses to punish criminals who commit a grotesque crime with death then why is that a federal issue? Don't commit that crime in those states. The States are supposed to have the majority of police power, right? Death is no more cruel and unusual than raping a child who has to live with that experience their whole life. How is it the death penalty was acceptable for horse thieves back in the day but not now for child rapists?

jon | September 9, 2008 11:50 AM | Reply

well, for some people, the death penalty isn't acceptable at all.

Thomas F | September 9, 2008 11:56 AM | Reply

How many times has the court reheard cases, and of that how many times has the court changed it's decision?

Bill | September 9, 2008 2:53 PM | Reply

I scanned but did not read that decision in detail, but based on my quick scan, there is much in the reasoning to disagree with.

It's also interesting how Stevens, in his Heller dissent, whined that the Court was overturning a law passed by the duly elected representatives of the people - a law that the people clearly felt was valuable in protecting them from violent criminals. Yet in Kennedy, he had no problem doing exactly that - overturning a state law passed by elected representatives, which people obviously wanted. And this in spite plenty of history in support of applying the penalty in such cases. And this case was pretty heinous.

OK, so don't give him the death penalty. A quick 2x4 to the back of the cranium reducing the creep to a vegetative state would be fine with me. Yeah, I guess I'm going Old Testament in a way...

Leave a comment