Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« How will ACLU react to Heller? Pt. 2 | Main | Liberal vs. conservative wings of the Court »

DC's gun crime

Posted by David Hardy · 2 July 2008 12:10 PM

From an article in the Washingtonian:

"Gun violence is relatively rare across the Potomac River in Virginia, despite the fact that guns are easily bought and registered there. And there is much less gunplay in urbanized parts of Montgomery County, just over the line from DC.

Why? Activists outside the criminal-justice system blame poverty and the flow of illegal guns into DC; police and prosecutors point to cases like that of D’Angelo Thomas."

Police stopped his car; four guys and five pistols inside. Three of them were on probation -- and Thomas on probation for robbery (i.e., he was a felon in possession) and a gun violation. But DC hadn't done the paperwork to charge him in time for the initial appearance. The judge dismissed charges against all four. The paperwork arrived in the courtroom ten minutes later, but he'd already been released (I guess DC can be fast at that) and was gone. 11 days later he fatally shot someone.

"“Suspects arrested in DC don’t fear the criminal-justice system,” says Edgar Domenech, head of the DC field office of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. “The majority of the gun cases go through Superior Court, and they don’t see any real jail time.”

DC police officer Tamika Hampton says she has made a number of arrests for CPWL—carrying a pistol without a license. “They get right back out on the street,” she says. “They know it when I make the arrest. After I process them, they walk out of court the same time I do. They laugh at me.”"
.......
"Sounds tough, but any change in gun enforcement laws has to pass through a DC Council that sometimes seems to favor criminals over cops.

Since the 1970s, when it passed the landmark ban on handguns, the 13-member council has been among the nation’s most liberal legislatures on law-enforcement problems.

Until the law was changed two years ago, even a convicted felon caught with a gun in DC could be charged at most with a misdemeanor and would likely serve no time.

In early 2005 then-mayor Anthony Williams proposed reforms to toughen penalties on many crimes, including gun possession. Judiciary Committee chair Phil Mendelson held the bill in his committee for a year and a half.... Mendelson also doesn’t believe in holding violent offenders while they are awaiting trial. Mayor Williams had proposed changes in the law that would make it easier for judges to hold suspects. Mendelson stripped the provisions from the bill."

· Crime and statistics

7 Comments | Leave a comment

Gregory Morris | July 2, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply

Doesn't surprise me one bit.

Jim D. | July 2, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply

I have always thought it would be interesting to make Public Defender an elected office. If nothing else, the campaigns would be amusing ("I'll plead these suckers OUT!").

It appears D.C. has taken it a step a further. You have to REALLY KNOW your constituency to behave like this and get away with it ("Vote for me. I'll keep you out of JAIL!" "Your man on the inside!").

Jim | July 2, 2008 1:04 PM | Reply

If public defenders were elected in DC you would drive all the bad guys to the polls and none of them would ever see any time.

Rich | July 2, 2008 3:00 PM | Reply

Think of former Major Barry, maybe the council was making sure none of their friends or connections did time as that might interrupt their supply :)

Carl in Chicago | July 2, 2008 6:23 PM | Reply

Simply Unbelievable.

RSweeney | July 3, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply

actually, this is DC's problem, liberal victimist apologists for criminals run the government.

So we have the typical moral inversion of liberalism, good productive people are portrayed as bad (and thus subject to restrictions and taxation) and bad people are portrayed as misunderstood victims (and thus subject to our help).

Insanity.

mike w. | July 3, 2008 9:26 PM | Reply

"Gun violence is relatively rare across the Potomac River in Virginia, despite the fact that guns are easily bought and registered there."

I can't help but point out that unlike D.C., Virginia does not require gun owners to register their firearms. D.C. and Maryland require registration and all that's done is waste taxpayer money.

Leave a comment