Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Massachusetts quietly moving to double permit fees | Main | Post-Heller roundup »

Chicago digs in its heels

Posted by David Hardy · 25 July 2008 09:43 AM

Good.

Hat tip to Carl in Chicago....

· Chicago gun case

5 Comments | Leave a comment

AMB | July 25, 2008 10:31 AM | Reply

The only way we're going to get incorporation is if someone's willing to fight back. Chicago apparently is going to play the role, all for the good of incorporation.

Now, if they LOSE at the 7th Circuit, we've got to hope they'll continue the fight.

A smart, smart man who knows the Chicago political scene said, "Daily will fight back. He sees himself as god, son of god."

Robin | July 25, 2008 10:37 AM | Reply

How come the same characters that want everything under the sun handled (paid for) by the feds don't want some rights recognized by the BOR enforced at the federal level?

Gene Hoffman | July 25, 2008 11:12 AM | Reply

I do love when the other side helps our cause. One of the sweetest effects of them not caving:

"The District Court just ruled X. Senator Obama, do you believe the Chicago handgun ban is Constitutional?"

Flip-flop that!

-Gene

Critic | July 25, 2008 11:10 PM | Reply

http://wiki.calgunsfoundation.org/index.php/Nordyke_v._King will likely come to a conclusion long before the Chicago and San Francisco cases even get close. And what's more, Nordyke isn't just about keeping, it's about bearing in public.

bicentennialman | July 29, 2008 12:09 PM | Reply

The second amendment doesn't apply at the state and municipality level?

Why, was some exception carved out in the incorporation doctrine?

Leave a comment