Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.6.2
Site Design by Sekimori

« More on the Jack Weinstein gun lawsuits | Main | Obama's proposal to ban gun stores within 5 miles of a school »

Thoughts on reasoned discourse

Posted by David Hardy · 9 June 2008 01:58 PM

Snowflakes in Hell has some strategic thoughts on reasoned discourse, why our side tends to use it, and why the other side gets upset when we do.

2 Comments | Leave a comment

straightarrow | June 9, 2008 5:36 PM | Reply

Sorry, I can't go over there to read it. Sebastian is afraid of me and has banned me. A link will take me there, anyway, but out of deference to the ladies I will refrain.

I am sure however, that what he said is quite pragmatic.

The Mechanic | June 10, 2008 11:26 AM | Reply

He's right. You don't win wars by underestimating your enemy.
The French thought they were all kinds of superior to the Viet Cong and had their a$$es handed to them.
The Libs and the Anti's have some brilliant diabolical geniuses so we can't get ever get complacent or turn your back on one.

Leave a comment