Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Now, this is pretty brazen | Main | Glad to know the DC gun ban has made things safer »

Public belief in 2A

Posted by David Hardy · 4 June 2008 05:25 PM

Here's latest Harris Poll. Asked if the Second Amendment supported an individual right to arms or a state right to a militia --

41% said individual right
29% said both (which I think is the correct answer, but the Harris people wondered)
Between the two, 70% believe the 2A represents an individual right.

17% said state right only, and 5% said neither (?). I assume the rest were undecideds.

So that's really (if you understand the Amendment, which the Harris people don't, a 4:1 majority for individual right. As Gene Volokh pointed out, if someone wants to argue "living constitution," it would certainly appear that the Second Amendment is "living," indeed quite robust.

3 Comments | Leave a comment

bill-tb | June 5, 2008 8:03 AM | Reply

Interesting, I wonder what does both mean? It is the restriction side that the 2A right would not work for both ... States could counter the US Constitution by regulating the right out of existence, like CA is doing today.

Would like to hear your views.

robin | June 5, 2008 8:29 AM | Reply

It seems to me these surveys assume that people know what gun control laws exist already. Most people do not know what laws exist and perpetually say more are needed. The ignorance is made worse by politicians claiming they need more laws to keep crime down.

Gordon | June 8, 2008 3:33 AM | Reply

To me (agreeing with someone else), the second is both an Individual and a collective Right. It is a Right of individuals to come together as a Militia, bearing their personal Arms.

Leave a comment