Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.6.2
Site Design by Sekimori

« How NOT to rob a store | Main | At first I thought this was satire... »

I'm glad that NY City thinks only LEOs should carry...

Posted by David Hardy · 7 June 2008 09:10 PM

Hofstra campus police see a fellow burst thru their security checkpoint, confront a fellow who was dating his ex-girlfriend, and stick a gun in his face. They arrest him, and find out he's an NYPD officer with his service pistol

Hat tip to reader Greg Mirsky...

6 Comments | Leave a comment

RKV | June 8, 2008 6:08 AM | Reply

Hopefully soon to be an ex-police officer, then a convicted felon.

Wondering | June 8, 2008 6:25 PM | Reply

Why wasn't he charged with "assault with a deadly weapon"?

straightarrow | June 8, 2008 8:52 PM | Reply

he has already received all the penalty he will. 30 days without pay. Bet on it.

wrangler5 | June 9, 2008 9:10 AM | Reply

He deserves a felony conviction and a year in the general population. And yes, I understand that that would probably be a death sentence.

But unless and until at least ONE of these thugs has to take it in the neck, ALL OTHERS who are inclined to jack-booted ways get the message that nothing will happen to them, and they continue their depredations on the citizenry.

straightarrow | June 9, 2008 9:39 AM | Reply

No argument from me, Wrangler.

John | June 9, 2008 3:53 PM | Reply

Since the court "granted orders of protection for the man and Chaudhry's ex-girlfriend," I presume he can't carry at all, on-duty or not.

Leave a comment