Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Walter Williams on the Philadelphia cop-killers | Main | How many home FFLs? »

Word of shakeups in ATF command

Posted by David Hardy · 26 May 2008 11:06 AM

Word is circulating that a number of ATF supervisors, from field up to high HQ levels, Assistant Directors and such, are being effectively suspended (effectively, but without using that term) while higher powers look into their competence and allegations of abuse and/or fraud. The Inspector General is said to be taking a role, and some of those involved in matters like Red's Trading Post are under the microscope.

About time; I just hope it goes far enough. There's a lot of good agents out there, who're perfectly reasonable toward firearm owners and honest in their work. The problem is for decades the agency has overlooked the ones who weren't and too often promoted them. (It was esp. bad in the late 70s, when the driving force was producing arrests and seizures, so that the abusive guys were "getting results" and the reasonable ones were not -- and for bureaucratic reasons, including the fact that US Attorneys wouldn't prosecute, felon-in-possession case were useless).

· BATFE

12 Comments | Leave a comment

Robert | May 26, 2008 11:54 AM | Reply

I'm unconvinced that there are ANY "good" officers left serving in the BATFE. They all know what agency they work for and what it does.

Jim Kindred | May 26, 2008 1:09 PM | Reply

Jed,

I have no lawsuit of any sort so if I have something negative to say about the NRA it is because of something the NRA did not me. I am a life member of the NRA but I have not supported them since the back stabbing of May 1986 and will not until Uncle Wayne is no longer representing the NRA.

I suspect the post was pulled because it did not turnout to be an NRA lovefest. Not all gun owners are the fuds that the NRA caters to. As a military firearms collector I have felt the NRA stopped representing me many years ago.

Flash Gordon | May 26, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply

Those who expect perfection from the NRA don't understand that perfection is the enemy of the good, perhaps the very good. If it were not for the NRA we would be like England, Canada and Australia and the Second Amendment would be a dead letter.

Letalis Maximus, Esq. | May 26, 2008 1:32 PM | Reply

No organization made up of people is going to be perfect. The NRA, warts and all, is the *overall* best we have. Don't like it the way it is? Get involved. Make a difference.

Carl in Chicago | May 26, 2008 4:44 PM | Reply

Sheesh...seems that some people can never have enough ememies...

Don Gwinn | May 26, 2008 5:58 PM | Reply

Don't dismiss Kodos so casually. He's got some very salient points to make on dominion over the earth and the enslavement of hu-mans.

Chris | May 26, 2008 6:39 PM | Reply

Let's hope this isn't typical shuffling of the deck chairs that the government is famous for so that it appears to be working on the problem.

HerbM | May 26, 2008 9:44 PM | Reply

The "good" agents and usefully skilled personel should be sent over to the FBI and the whole BATF disbanded.

Joe Huffman | May 27, 2008 10:31 AM | Reply

The ATF has "agents" and "inspectors/investigators" (their title keeps changing). I've only dealt with the inspectors (three different ones now) and always was treated well.

The agents are the ones that break down doors, throw flash-bangs into your bedroom, and stomp kittens. The inspectors examine your paperwork, do audits, and make suggestions on how to more easily remain in compliance with the government regulations.

In an ideal, constitutional compliant world the ATF and it's functions (and the same for most of the FBI) would cease to exist. But that's not the world we live in. I'm fully in agreement that the FBI should take over the criminal aspects of the ATF. The FBI "charter" probably would have to be expanded to include the inspectors.

[I don't believe the tone of this comment has been affected by the fact that I have an ATF inspector visiting my explosives magazine on Monday but in the interests of full disclosure I thought you should know this.]

MMM | May 27, 2008 10:53 AM | Reply

Huh - you have to wonder what OIG is looking for. Info on Red's? Cav Arms? Some other bit of corruption? Could make for interesting times over there...

Uncle Lar | May 27, 2008 3:19 PM | Reply

I'm betting that the very public exposure of the Olofson travesty is what pushed things over the edge. We've been complaining for years now, built up a groundswell of public opinion and inputs, but what the powers that be really hate is negative press on a national scale.

Phillep Harding | June 1, 2008 11:58 AM | Reply

It doesn't matter how good a guy the inspector is, his first loyalty is to his family and his retirement. That means he has to keep getting paid.

When someone higher up says "frog", he can either jump, or leave.

The jerks and jackasses on the enforcement side face the same problem, of course, "Shape up or ship out", and I'd rather they take the second option. The little I've seen shows them to be sanctimonious asses, or controlled by same.

Leave a comment