Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Arizona governor casts veto | Main | How you (and the Court) reads a sharply divided decision »

Taking down an editorial praising AHSA

Posted by David Hardy · 28 May 2008 11:44 AM

SayUncle does the job nicely.

· antigun groups

3 Comments | Leave a comment

Letalis Maximus, Esq. | May 28, 2008 4:05 PM | Reply

I hadn't noticed a constitutional provision or amendment protecting the right to own and possess race horses.

CDR D | May 28, 2008 4:42 PM | Reply

>>>If Second Amendment absolutists keep standing up and daring others to pry their guns from their "cold, dead fingers," eventually somebody's going to do it.

Maybe.

But those "somebodies" will have to bring guns to do it.

That'd be a fine howdy-do...

straightarrow | May 28, 2008 9:35 PM | Reply

>>>If Second Amendment absolutists keep standing up and daring others to pry their guns from their "cold, dead fingers," eventually somebody's going to do it."

But probably not the first somebodies, and maybe not the second or third set of somebodies.

The dumb bastard doesn't notice that the dare he implies exists is only valid as a dare when those somebodies first defy the constitution and thereby become criminals, regardless of uniform or state sanctioning of their actions.

Nobody thinks it wrong to warn that shoplifters will be prosecuted. Why? Because the warning is predicated on the initiation of a criminal act by the potential prosecutee. Same for those who would "pry" firearms, they must first commit a criminal act, so warning them of consequences is not a dare, it is fair warning.

Leave a comment