Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« McCain announces Justice Advisory Committee | Main | Steve Halbrook's new book out! »

Antigun fundraising

Posted by David Hardy · 6 May 2008 07:49 PM

Snowflakes in Hell has an interesting post regarding the pro and antigun PACs this election cycle. Brady Campaign's PAC has under $50,000, and has so far raised... $73. NRA's PAC has over six million, and has raised eight million, of which about 3/4 came from donors of under $200.

His guess that perhaps Brady has been forced to cross off PAC fundraising in an effort to keep its regular operations bankrolled does seem a likely explanation. But $73?

Hat tip to Instapundit, whose referrals are keeping Snowflakes in Hell swamped for the moment...

· antigun groups

5 Comments | Leave a comment

Sebastian | May 6, 2008 11:23 PM | Reply

Things seems to have quieted down for now. Turns out I had some pretty suboptimal settings on the server that I didn't notice until being linked by Glenn. Hopefully a new server will be had shortly.

Jeremy | May 7, 2008 8:10 AM | Reply

The Brady campaign is getting so desperate that they are calling, and sending letters to me asking for a handout. I'm on every pro-gun mailing list in the country. I still can't figure out why they would ever think that I would stoop low enough to help their anti-American cause.

Carl in Chicago | May 7, 2008 8:55 AM | Reply

I've been wondering about this and would like people's thoughts.

Assuming we get a relatively strong individual rights ruling from the SCOTUS this late June...

Do folks think such a ruling would add to or detract from the (A) fervor and (B) effectiveness of organizations such as the Brady Campaign, VPC, LCAV, etc.?

Bill | May 7, 2008 12:36 PM | Reply

It would work the Brady folks and their ilk into a frothy lather and give them something else to distort and baldly lie about with their insane and absurd predictions of "wild west" shootouts and "blood running in the streets," blah, blah, blah. So I think it would temporarily add to their fervor but I doubt it would do much for their effectiveness.

The rest of us will simply nod in acknowledgement of what we already know, and move on.

Jim D. | May 7, 2008 1:00 PM | Reply

Sooner or later one side will be perceived as irrelevant. The faster we get Brady into that category the better, otherwise it will be us.

The genuine problem, is that history has a habit of moving on its own and rendering arguments moot. The underlying political trend in the world in general and the US in particular is towards a bigger more authoritarian government and away from individual rights and responsibilities.

If we rely on the decline of western civilization to empower us, we'll end up like Great Britan and the EU -- hopelessly encumbered by a parasitic bureaucracy that simply cannot be killed. If the Patriot Tax Movement succeeds (don't hold yer breath), they will do most of the work for us.

Right now, we are looking at being absorbed by the Mexican diaspora, conquered by militant Islam, and purchased by China. How do you deregulate an economy to fight this when the tax-eaters outnumber the revenue-makers?

Leave a comment