Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.3
Site Design by Sekimori

« Don't you hate family feuds? | Main | Wikipedia assist needed »

Obama's comment....

Posted by David Hardy · 13 April 2008 10:45 AM

Hmmm... rural folk are bitter, and that's why they "cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

It's a pretty strange observation from a fellow who has spent the last few months trying convince people that:

1. Really likes the Second Amendment;

2. Is quite religious; and

3. Absolutely opposes free trade agreements.

· Politics

8 Comments | Leave a comment

Robert | April 13, 2008 12:10 PM | Reply

It least in the church that I bitterly cling to, I haven't had to listen to racist, idiotic ranting from the pulpit for the last 20 years.

Anonymous | April 13, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply

TRANSCRIPT:
OBAMA: So, it depends on where you are, but I think it’s fair to say that the places where we are going to have to do the most work are the places where people are most cynical about government. The people are mis-appre…they’re misunderstanding why the demographics in our, in this contest have broken out as they are. Because everybody just ascribes it to ‘white working-class don’t wanna work [!]— don’t wanna vote for the black guy.’ That’s…there were intimations of that in an article in the Sunday New York Times today - kind of implies that it’s sort of a race thing.

Here’s how it is: in a lot of these communities in big industrial states like Ohio and Pennsylvania, people have been beaten down so long. They feel so betrayed by government that when they hear a pitch that is premised on not being cynical about government, then a part of them just doesn’t buy it. And when it’s delivered by — it’s true that when it’s delivered by a 46-year-old black man named Barack Obama, then that adds another layer of skepticism.

But — so the questions you’re most likely to get about me, ‘Well, what is this guy going to do for me? What is the concrete thing?’ What they [the “white working-class”] wanna hear is so we’ll give you talking points about what we’re proposing — to close tax loopholes, uh you know uh roll back the tax cuts for the top 1%, Obama’s gonna give tax breaks to uh middle-class folks and we’re gonna provide healthcare for every American.

But the truth is, is that, our challenge is to get people [the “white working-class”] persuaded that we can make progress when there’s not evidence of that in their daily lives. You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest [which are still predominantly “white”], the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.

[Now you can virtually hear Obama thinking: OOPS!!! I just F***ED up!!! I’d better “change” what I just said!!! I just repeatedly characterized, throughout the last four paragraphs, “a lot” of the “white working-class” folks across the country as “bitter” people whose resentment—apparently toward non-whites, who else could he mean? . . . “it’s . . . a race thing”— compels them to “cling” to such crutches as “religion” or the Second Amendment, i.e., “guns,” “anti-immigrant sentiment,” etc.]

Um, now these are in some communities, you know. I think what you’ll find is, is that people of every background — there are gonna be a mix of people, you can go in the toughest neighborhoods, you know working-class lunch-pail folks, you’ll find Obama enthusiasts. And you can go into places where you think I’d be very strong and people will just be skeptical. The important thing is that you show up and you’re doing what you’re doing.

***

Let's see.

Senator Obama begins by contextualizing his remarks as referring to the “white working-class.”

Senator Obama then appears to begin attacking the implication in “the Sunday New York Times today” that his lack of support among the “white working-class” is a “sort of a race thing.”

So far so good.

However, Senator Obama then separates himself from the “white working-class” by using polarizing pronoun and adjective references 15 consecutive times: “they,” 7 times; “them,” 2 times; “their,” 2 times; “these,” 2 times; “a lot,” 2 times.

After referring to the “white working-class” 15 consecutive times in four consecutive paragraphs, Senator Obama then tries to insinuate that he is referring to “people of every background . . . a mix of people, . . . you know working-class lunch-pail folks.”

But the damage is done.

Senator Obama was trying to bridge a gap with those comments, but instead he “changed” it into an unbridgable chasm.

doug in colorado | April 13, 2008 2:08 PM | Reply

Another arrogant phony liberal...if he speaks in the deep south does he put on a phony homey black accent?

Why doesnt he just stand at the foot of the freeway ramp with a sign around his neck that says "Will say or do anything for power."?

Doug

jon | April 13, 2008 3:14 PM | Reply

by using phraseology as "where we have to do the most work" he's pretty much giving away the whole sham: he knows he is going to have to straight up lie to get a single vote out of these "bitter" people.

Don Gwinn | April 13, 2008 4:00 PM | Reply

Have you heard the older interview snippet now? I think they intended it to rehabilitate him, but he just keeps digging.

As near as I can come to verbatim, he tells a CBS interviewer that rural people don't know where their health care will come from, they don't have jobs because big business laid them off, they have no real hope for the future, but at least they can grab their rifles and go hunting and there's some camaraderie there, between friends and fathers and sons, and he understands that, he really does.

I don't usually advise Democrats, but I couldn't help but yell "STOP DIGGING!" at the radio.

Jake | April 14, 2008 12:43 AM | Reply

When did Americans become so dependant on the Feds? Can't we do for ourselves. If I were to lose my job, I certainly wouldn't go crying to the president for help. I wouldn't be blaming them either.

It's kinda funny (sad?) that he thinks that it's bitterness that drives us to exercise our 1st (religion) & 2nd (guns) amendment rights. He speaks as if they're crutches rather than unalienable American birth-rights!

It seems to me that nearly 40 years ago, shortly after taking the oath of office, a Democrat uttered the words, "Ask not what your country can do for you...". What ever happened to that idea?

Jake | April 14, 2008 12:49 AM | Reply

Sorry. That should be nearly 50, not 40.

The Mechanic | April 14, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply

The 'good' blue collar jobs just are NOT coming back. Affirmative action has gone over the top and reparations are now owed the other way.

Leave a comment