Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Reader's experience at Heller | Main | DARPA testing new scope »

Ooops....

Posted by David Hardy · 29 March 2008 12:55 PM

The DEA lost 91 guns and 231 laptops. And no one can guarantee that the laptops didn't contain info best kept secret: the agency only began encrypting their contents in 2005.

5 Comments | Leave a comment

straightarrrow | March 29, 2008 4:08 PM | Reply

Where the Hell is the ATF on this deal? Seems to be a much higher willful error rate than they found at Red's. Of course, theirs is higher too. Must be one of those quid pro quo things.

Flighterdoc | March 29, 2008 5:43 PM | Reply

Does that include Agent Glock-Fohty?

Ed S. | March 29, 2008 6:23 PM | Reply

Of course not, Flighterdoc. He is a "professional".

jon | March 30, 2008 9:34 AM | Reply

security is largely comprised of human elements: policy is number one (how parties agree things will be secured), and behavior is number two (whether the policy is violated). here's why.

once you lose a laptop, the software encryption you've used is meaningless -- you have to assume that anyone interested in your data has access to the necessary hardware and software to crack it.

only the algorithms that make feasibility difficult to achieve (i.e. anything that makes it take three months even on a supercomputer) are worth using... and maybe in reality they usually stay the attack long enough for recovery/interdiction... but does taking that chance sound like good security policy to you for your files? how about for the DEA's files?

straightarrrow | March 30, 2008 7:24 PM | Reply

Maybe they're selling those laptops to interested parties?

Leave a comment