Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Len Savage to be on Lou Dobbs tonight! | Main | ScotusBlog on amicus briefs »

Len Savage interview

Posted by David Hardy · 14 March 2008 08:54 AM

Here.

On the way to DC for the Heller argument, so blogging will be light for a while.

UPDATE: reader Chris Masure writes that part two of Len's interview is available at: http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2008/03/14/tucker.government.guns.part.2.cnn

8 Comments | Leave a comment

kalashnikat | March 14, 2008 3:03 PM | Reply

I know a lot of folks who have had at least one "slamfire" from certain semi-auto weapons...SKS's are known for it, and the prophet John Moses Browning's sacred 1911A1 is not immune, if I remember correctly. A broken spring, a bent or dirty firing pin, too much cosmolene/ppowder residue/mud left inside the bolt of a milsurp rifle and the pin can be left sticking out of the bolt when it slams shut...Whoever reported, prosecuted, participated in the raid or in other ways persecuted this individual in this matter should be taken out to the nearest firing range and used for target practice.

Jim W | March 14, 2008 3:56 PM | Reply

If not cleaned sufficiently, the SKS is well known to slamfire.

Let's also not forget that any closed-bolt gun will cook off the magazine if shot a sufficient number of times to heat up the barrel.

denton | March 14, 2008 10:48 PM | Reply

"The term “machinegun” means any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger."

OK, so if I can design a firearm that requires TWO distinct functions of the trigger to initiate full auto fire, is it not a machinegun?

As written, it's only a machinegun if full auto is initiated by a SINGLE function of the trigger.

If full auto is initiated by pushing the trigger forward, then backward, by my count that's two functions of the trigger.

Or if the gun cooks off a round, multiple functions of the trigger were required to bring the weapon up to such a high temperature. That seems to be outside the "single function" construct as well.

Letalis Maximus, Esq. | March 15, 2008 6:55 AM | Reply

That Pantene Pro-V doesn't make my hair that shiny and sleek. What's up with that?

Chris | March 15, 2008 8:44 AM | Reply

Personally, I use Hoppes 9 as a conditioner.

Jim W | March 15, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply

I use WD-40 because I am old school.

RKM | March 15, 2008 5:28 PM | Reply

Hoppes 9 is way older than WD-40!

Here is an indepth discussion on the incident.

http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=6&t=507483

Letalis Maximus, Esq. | March 16, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply

This "alleged" slam fire incident has more to it than meets the eye. There are M16 parts involved, and more than a little "he said/he said."

The real "truth" will never come out on this one. In my view, it was best left alone by our side.

Leave a comment