Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Sniping with an M-1 ... Abrams | Main | "You're among friends, say what you really mean" »

Call out the militia?

Posted by David Hardy · 31 March 2008 08:41 PM

USA Today reports:

"Facing tighter budgets, law enforcement agencies across the country are increasingly turning to civilians to respond to some calls that sworn officers and deputies are usually responsible for.

That means people calling 911 to report a traffic accident, a burglarized home or a stolen car may be greeted by a civilian in a polo shirt instead of a gun-toting officer.

"It hasn't been universally adopted throughout the country. But most areas have at least thought about the alternative and are more open to it now because of the economy," said Richard Brady, president of the Palo Alto, Calif.-based Matrix Consulting Group that has worked with more than 250 law enforcement agencies.

The idea of using civilians, who require less training and are less expensive than sworn officers, to respond to minor police calls has been around since the late 1980s."

Sounds like a plan to me. In my life, I've reported a burglary, an attempted one, and a theft from a car. In all. I had likely fingerprints. In no case were they able to actually send an officer, or to take the prints (even when, in two of the cases, I offered to bring the material to be fingerprinted down to the central police station). I assume it was simple overload: too many thefts and too few folks to investigate them.

· militia

7 Comments | Leave a comment

denton | April 1, 2008 8:50 AM | Reply

The idea of using civilians to supplement the police force has been around a LOT longer than since 1980. The sheriff's posse and police auxiliaries are a very old (and good) idea.

Dave | April 1, 2008 12:46 PM | Reply

So, if I don't have a gun, but my neighbor does have a gun, if someone's breaking into my home at 3 A.M., should I phone my neighbor or the police?

Mike | April 1, 2008 3:45 PM | Reply

There are several problems with this approach, but most revolve around safety issues. Officers understand very well that even the most routine call can go bad very, very rapidly, and criminals might well set up civilian police employees, knowing them to be untrained to resist violence and unarmed.

And by the way, very few crimes of any kind, particularly vehicle burglaries, are ever solved by means of fingerprints. Reality is nothing like CSI where one feeds a perfect fingerprint into a computer that queries a massive database and spits out a match within seconds. Such crimes are solved through catching the bad guys with the goods, confessions, and various other kinds of common, competent police work.

Rivrdog | April 1, 2008 5:41 PM | Reply

As a retired LEO, I'm here to tell you that most LEO's will resent this approach, same as trained journeymen resent scabs.

Then there's the other side of the coin: we tax ourselves to provide police service. When we stop getting that service, perhaps we should stop paying those taxes, not accept "free" service from some wonk in a polo shirt.

Citizens need to stay involved, because these auxilliaries tend to have the worst sorts of "mission creep", and soon wind up performing duty beyond their level of training and experience. I've not only seen it for myself, I've been asked to train them.

If the dollars aren't going far enough, ask to examine the budgets: you will likely find that administration is eating a larger and larger share of the operations budgets, but doing no actual work to contain crime.

straightarrrow | April 4, 2008 12:38 AM | Reply

and soon wind up performing duty beyond their level of training and experience........

just like a Hell of a lot of cops, but without the attitude.

chunk | April 6, 2008 4:57 PM | Reply

yet another anti-cop post by straightarrow...don't you have anything original to add?

ben | April 7, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply

A little OT: Why is it that reporters use certain phrases religiously? Why is the weird phrase "gun-toting" always used where "armed" would be so much more straightforward?

Leave a comment