Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Shooting at New Life Church | Main | Canada registers stolen guns to new owners »

"Use" of a firearm in a drug transaction

Posted by David Hardy · 10 December 2007 11:47 AM

The Supreme Court ruled today in Watson v. US. Watson concerned a defendant who got a lengthy sentence for a use of a firearm in drug offense, where he bartered drugs in exchange for getting a gun.

The Court, per Justice Souter, holds that *receiving* the gun in such a trade is not "using" it. The majority distinguishes earlier case law holding that *giving* the gun in such a deal can be using it. Justice Ginsburg concurs with a note that she'd overrule the earlier case relating to giving, as well: the likely Congressional intent was to punish "use" in the sense of using a gun as a tool, not just as property for barter.

2 Comments | Leave a comment

reloader | December 10, 2007 12:28 PM | Reply

Frick and Frack at their best...

Jim | December 10, 2007 12:37 PM | Reply

I wonder how the justices square that in their mind with a similar decision several years back that a firearm "carried" in the trunk of a car during a drug transaction is "carried" for the purposes of a similar law...

To be fair, Ginsburg dissented from that opinion, and also drafted this Watson opinion.

Leave a comment