Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« California bans .22 rimfire use in condor areas | Main | Church gunman killed himself, after heroine scored multiple hits »

Gun free zone liability act

Posted by David Hardy · 11 December 2007 09:30 AM

Alan Korwin reports that bills have been introduced in AZ and GA to make entities that declare "gun free zones" liable for any harm caused by impairment of self-defense.

Update: I'm informed the GA bill is from 2003; there is no such bill pending there now.

Via Instapundit, who has in the past suggested you could get the same result under common law. It might be clearer now -- I mean, every mass killing I can remember occurred either in a gun free zone, or a place where the killer would expect no one to be armed (an Amish schoolhouse, a church -- the killer in the Colorado cases may have *thought* churches were gun-free in that state). And every mass killing that was stopped short was stopped by armed civilians, not by LE.

Also via Instapundit, SayUncle has an impressive list of armed civilians vs. mass killers.

· Self defense ~ · State legislation

12 Comments | Leave a comment

Flighterdoc | December 11, 2007 10:33 AM | Reply

Wasn't the utah shooting (in a gun-free mall) stopped by an off-duty cop?

Thats not exactly a civilian.

However these laws are LONG overdue.

mariner | December 11, 2007 10:39 AM | Reply

Police are civilians.

David McCleary | December 11, 2007 12:27 PM | Reply

Interersting

When I tried to get this as part of the Michigan CPL law I was told I was nuts.

Sounded like a good idea then and sounds even better now.

I think that a very good common law neg case could do the same withthe correct factsjudgers and jury members.

Spider | December 11, 2007 12:33 PM | Reply

Guns don't kill people, politicians do!

karrde | December 11, 2007 3:06 PM | Reply

I don't know if Reynolds had it or not...but someone posted the reverse idea: that a mall that posted "friendly to CCW" signs, or some such, would be shielded from having to pay damages to anyone harmed by a CCW holder stopping a crime in progress.

Think positive, not negative!

dwlawson | December 11, 2007 4:06 PM | Reply

We had such a law proposed in IL in 2005.
http://ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=477&GAID=8&DocTypeID=HB&LegId=14844&SessionID=50&GA=94

Naturally killed in committee as it would pretty much bankrupt the State of IL and City of Chicago!

Flighterdoc | December 11, 2007 5:08 PM | Reply

It seems that Colorado law doesn't explicitly prohibit carrying hardly anywhere (or at least I can't find the pertinent law):

http://cbi.state.co.us/ccw/Statutes/18-12-214.asp

Churches are not exempt locations. The murderer should have checked.

Pete S. | December 12, 2007 1:13 AM | Reply

Interesting...if companies were held liable for failure to allow people to defend themselves by actively denying them that ability, I would suspect that many would revise their policies.

This certainly is an interesting way to combat the gun-free-zone.

Hartley | December 12, 2007 10:46 AM | Reply

Until these laws get enacted, how about creating some sort of database of what establishments are endangering us and which ones don't? I already know that Costco and Fry's Electronics prohibit CCW without providing any actual security, while WalMart, Sam's Club, Cabela's and Sportsman's Warehouse do allow CCW, but it would be nice to have a resource that would tell me BEFORE I arrive at the front door (or allow my family to go without me).
Or would that effort just attract a lawsuit?

KCSteve | December 12, 2007 11:39 AM | Reply

Hartley

Check for a pro-ccw site for your state - most of them have lists of who's posted.

The name will probably be some variation of (state)(carry)

Here are a few I know:
http://www.missouricarry.com
http://www.ksccw.com
http://www.iowacarry.com
http://www.coloradocarry.com (I think)

cargosquid | December 13, 2007 8:05 AM | Reply

Oleg Volk has the perfect sign for the times:

http://olegvolk.net/gallery/d/22932-1/sign_002.jpg

Take a look.

Kirk Parker | December 13, 2007 10:56 AM | Reply

Cabela's and Sportsmen's Warehouse don't just allow CCW, their rule is "whatever is legal in the state is legal here", meaning that they explicitly allow Open Carry (as long as you're not planning to unholster your pistol for any reason.)

The Walmart/Sam's Club issue is almost the same, with more local variation due to local managers/asst managers/greeters.

For lots of ongoing discussion on this subject, see OpenCarry.org.

Leave a comment