Parker oral argument

WHAT ABOUT ME?!

A SECOND AMENDMENT CASE NO ONE WANTS?

"WRIT OF MANDAMUS" STAGE

Compare these two Second Amendment cases.

REPRESENTED BY ATTORNEYS:
Silveira v Lockyer, No. 03-51

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/03-51.htm

UNREPRESENTED:
Hamrick v President Bush

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/03-145.htm

Both of the above cases were denied Certiorari. But the difference is the U.S. Supreme Court's judicial bias against the UNREPRESENTED case.

Silveira got the publicity and amici briefs. My case got neither.

Responds in both cases filed Waiver of Right to Respond. In the Silveira case the Supreme Court ordered Lockyer to respond. Lockyer filed his response. In my case the Supreme Court did NOT want a response from President Bush.

Why? Because my case pushes for "National Open Carry Handgun" from a U.S. merchant seaman's point of view. My Supreme Court case No. 03-145 originated with a Petition for Writ of Mandamus for a endorsement on my Merchant Mariner's Document (ID card) for "National Open Carry Handgun" as a Secondn Amendment right in response to mandatory small arms training as a prerequisite for employment as an Able Seaman aboard a U.S. Government ammunition ship coming out of the shipyard in Newport News, Virginia under 46 U.S.C. 7306(a)(3). The U.S. Coast Guard denied my application for that endorsement in grounds that it would provide no benefit to marine safety or security (circa 2002). I have been in the federal courts ever since. I cannot get past the Motion to Dismiss because of judicial bigotry against unrepresented civil plaintiffs and against Second Amendment cases, especially one so daring as to advocate open carry nationwide, i.e.in intrastate and interstate travel as a seaman's occupation for international travel. My case is tantamount to kicking law and order back 300 years when everyone openly carried weapons.

"CIVIL RICO ACT STAGE"

After the U.S. Supreme Court denied my appeal, No. 03-145, I filed a new case with the U.S. District Court in DC, No. 03-2160, but this time I employed the civil RICO Act as a new approach. Low and behold the dirty tricks by the federal courts and the U.S. Attorneys, the U.S. Department of Justice and the political scandals relating to the election of 2004 and the repurcussions in 2006 fell on my cases like an avalanche.

My case was reassigned on a Motion for Recusal against judge Richard W. Roberts to the same judge Reggie B. Walton who had declared in the Seegars case that the Second Amendment does not apply to the citizens of the District of Columbia. The circumstances on how judge Walton got assigned to my case is criminally suspicious. In his response to my Motion for recusal judge Roberts recommended that my case be assigned to a judge "outside" the District of Columbia. But for some unexplained reason judge Walton got assigned to my case. I am still trying to find out hiow that happened, I thought a judge who already had ruled against a Second Amendment case would not be ethically permitted to take on another Second Amendment case. But this is just the tip of the iceberg in judicial corruption and obstructions of justice.

I am trying to apply the CIVIL RICO ACT against the U.S. Government and against the United Nations over the Second Amendment. The attached PDF document is my latest attempt to break the logjam of judicial corruption against the Second Amendment.

"SECOND AMENDMENT AS AN
INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHT" STAGE

For the last 5 years I have been fighting in "No Man's Land" of National Open Carry in the federal courts keeping pace should-to-shoulder with the cliquish Second Amendmet cases loved by the myopic gun rights organizations. After my first loss at the U.S. Supreme Court in 2003 I waited 3 years and another Supreme Court denial, No. 04-1150 before I got the idea to file a human rights complaint against the United States and against the United Nations with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in Washington, DC. They oversee the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Petition No. 1142-06, still pending review.

I got the idea to file a human rights complaint against the United States and the United Nations with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights because I read about the Jessica Gonzales story when it was at the U.S. Supreme Court and when she filed her own human rights complaint with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. The circumstances of her case, the "No Constitutiional Right to Police Protection" aspect was the perfect case for the human rights aspect of armed self-defense under the Second Amendment. Jessica Lenahan (formerly Gonzales) opens the door for my Second Amendment case as a human rights case with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.

My case follows on the coattails of Jessica Gonzales' (now Lenahan) human rights petition No. 1490-05. Her case opens the door to a Second Amendment as a huma right such as what I present in my Second Amendment case, especially since I am standing up against the United Nations global gun control agenda (see attached document for details).

"CITIZEN'S ARREST WARRANT OF FEDERAL JUDGES
AND SUPREME COURT CHIEF JUSTICE" STAGE

After my Civil RICO Act case at the DC Circuit was remanded back to the U.S. District Court in DC for further proceedings on Second Amendment grounds (DC Circuit affirmed the dismissal of my RICO Act claims) Judge Walton pulled another dirty trick on remand. Because the DC Circuit did not clarify on what was meant by "further proceedings" Judge Walton issued a so called "Scheduling Order" that was nothing more that a redo of Rule 7 pleadings giving the U.S. Attorney's office another chance to file a Motion to Dismiss instead of moving my case to the discovery phase under Rule 16 and Rule 26. In retaliation I beat the U.S. Attorney's office to the punch and filed my own Motion to Dismiss with expressed intent to refile my case with the U.S. District Office in Little Rock, Arkansas. However, this would prove to be a mistake because it was jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire.

The U.S. District Court in Little Rock was even more hostile to me as an unrepresented civil plaintiff than the DC court. Where the U.S. District Court in DC allowed me to file my cases without paying their filing fee as stipulated by law, 28 U.S.C. 1916, the U.S. District Court in Little Rock ignored that law and forced me to pay their filing fee. The original judge assigned to my case in Little Rock latter on died in the hospital. The distribution of that judge's cases caused a heavy burden on the other judges. The judge that was my case was given dismissed my case within a month after getting which amounts to an unethical housecleaning of an overburdened docket.

My appeal to the 8th Circuit in St. Louis was equally disastrous. The 8th Circuit demanded that I pay their filing fee or my case would be denied. I refused to pay, standing behind my statutory right of exemption from filing fees as a seaman under 28 U.S.C. 1916. The 8th Circuit denied my appeal for "lack of prosecution." Those dirty rats!

So, my Second Amendment case has evolved to a Seventh Amendment case for the right to a civil jury trial as a seaman under 28 U.S.C. 1916 and the right of a an unrepresented civil plaintiff with a civil RICO Act case to act as a Private Attorney General in defense of a constitutional right is now at the U.S. Supreme Court, my third trip. For the last 4 years I have been pushing the "Citizen's Arrest Warrant" for federal judges and court clerks for extorton under color of law. The U.S. Marshals Service is chomping at the bits to arrest me if I make any attempt to follow through with the Citizen's Arrest Warrant. I recently sent a letter to the Director of the U.S. Marshals Service for an official declaration of position on the matter. I'm still waitintg for his response.

Going after federal judges and the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court for extortion under color of law, 18 U.S.C. 872, is unthinkable in the eyes of the U.S. Marshals Service as though federal judges are above the law. Again, I find myself in "No Man's Land" following the myth of "Equal Justice Under the Law."

PUBLIC UNAWARE OF MY SECOND AMENDMENT CASE

I cannot explain why no one in the Second Amendment advocacy camp, i.e. NRA, SAF, JFPO, GOA, everyone, refuses to shead their media spotlight on my Second Amendment case as an unrepresented civil plaintiff. Is National Open Carry that repulsive in this politically correct society that the mere mention of it threatens the false reality of these chest-thumping gun groups?

For the love of God! My case deserves media attention. Everyone I have asked to write Op-Eds about my case has declined.

The lack of publicity is killing my cases.

Give it a rest. All our rights now squarely rest in the District of Columbia, et., al. v. Heller. The combatants are already engaged in battle in the Court. You might get better traction when the main fight is over.

And how much are the liberal Justices affecting
this Certioraripetition?

Like could they have been instrumental in the rewording of the legal complaint?

Might be a nice time of year to visit Washington.

Do a few million of you wish to join me?

What about the liberal Justices though?

I am worried that those Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse are going to alter things very
severely for us???????

Hey! Rudy DiGiacinto! Give it a rest??? ROFLMAO. Typical bandwagon main event behavior!

Sorry to bust in on your party but all our rights DO NOT squarely rest in Heller. The only right Heller rests on now is the right to own a handgun in the home.

My Second Amendment case is the B-Side to Heller. My case is about the right to travel intrastate and interstate while armed.

How about throwing some of your party favors my way!

Article I, Sec. 8 of the Constitution allows the congress authority to “provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the militia, …”

It appears that if congress had the power to arm the militia, the second amendment would have been totally unnecessary if the collective opinion was the standard on September 25th 1789.

If as much thought and study was given to the wording of the constitution, and the first ten amendments, as we have been lead to believe for the past two centuries, I find it extremely unlikely that the 2nd amendment was written merely to take up space on an already crowded document.

Oh God, are you still around? I give you credit for tenacity, even if you’re not able to accept good and free advice. We met years ago and I see you’re still a nut. Maybe you should team up with the mall ninjas and start a class action…

Might be a nice time of year to visit Washington.

Do a few million of you wish to join me?

Posted by: Chris at November 21, 2007 04:06 PM

Yes! How about a Million Rifle March?

http://www.wearethemilitia.org/2007/06/million_rifle_march.html