Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Supreme Court case on the way | Main | Premiere of my documentary! »

Article on Parker in Legal Times

Posted by David Hardy · 24 September 2007 12:21 PM

Parker attorney Bob Levy has published a concise article on the case in the Legal Times: here's a pdf of it.

· Parker v. DC

1 Comment | Leave a comment

djmoore | September 25, 2007 8:47 AM | Reply

That's a compelling summary of the case; thanks for posting it.

If I may, let me ask a more general question:
Let's say that the SC agrees with us, and declares that the Second means what it says: "shall not be infringed". What would the scope of their decision be?

Would that abolish all federal gun laws at a stroke? All state and local laws? Does it shut down the F& E divisions of BATFE? Or does each individual law and regulation have to be fought down in separate cases?

What happens to people who are imprisoned solely under D.C.'s gun laws?

Has it ever happened before that an entire class of well-established laws has been overturned as unconstitutional?

Leave a comment