Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Machine gun captured by Sgt. York may be destroyed | Main | University policy: if a gunman offers you his gun, refuse it »

The BitchGirls blog is back and running...

Posted by David Hardy · 20 August 2007 06:55 PM

Bitter wound up as the sole blogger at The BitchGirls (whose name started out when someone accused them of being gun toting just thats), and last week was opining that she couldn't carry the load alone. Then a legal blogger (henceforth Legal Bitch) signed up to share the load, and the blog is back in action.

One of the topics is a DC Circuit decision to the effect that a terminal cancer patient, with no medical options left, has no right to receive anticancer drugs with doctor's approval that are only partway through the FDA approval process (proven to be safe, not yet proven to be effective). There was an interesting dissent, pointing out that the courts have recognized (unenumerated) constitutional rights to marry, to engage in various forms of sex, to obtain an abortion from a physician, etc., yet here is a ruling that we don't have a right to try to stay alive, with medical approval, while hurting no one.

1 Comment | Leave a comment

straightarrow | August 21, 2007 12:15 AM | Reply

Let's just call it retroactive abortion, I think it's in the penumbra.

Leave a comment