Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Ted Nugent gives considered opinions on '08 race | Main | New Army sniping rifle »

John Edwards and straw man transactions

Posted by David Hardy · 24 August 2007 08:54 PM

Story here.

(To be fair, there's no indication that Edwards knew he was the beneficiary of a straw deal -- that is, it sounds as if the donor knew very well that he was setting up thousands of dollars in straw donations, but at least just now there is no indication that Edwards knew of the arrangements.).

Via Instapundit...

· Politics

2 Comments | Leave a comment

straightarrow | August 24, 2007 9:53 PM | Reply

He didn't know? And your point would be what exactly? If this was a gun purchase it would constitute "willful violation" would it not?

karrde | August 27, 2007 9:00 AM | Reply

Fieger's spinning it as politically-driven prosecution.

The charge doesn't make sense-if the donations weren't straw donations, he should say so. If they were, they are against the law.

If they are common, he could claim that, and then claim that he is being targeted for his political leanings. However, if they are common, maybe he could provide evidence leading prosecutors to those other cases.

I am slightly amused: Fieger has pushed for publicity several times before (Defended Jack Kevorkian, ran for governor). This doesn't look like good publicity for him.

Leave a comment