Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.3
Site Design by Sekimori

« Karl Rove's parthian shot | Main | Great slow-mo videography »

Great slow-mo videography

Posted by David Hardy · 26 August 2007 10:17 AM

In a British antigun commercial.

5 Comments | Leave a comment

Letalis | August 26, 2007 10:52 AM | Reply

Cool! Makes me wanna go out and shoot something.

Bill | August 26, 2007 11:10 AM | Reply

I liked the one with the big water bottle best. I'd like to know what they were using - shotgun slug? Looked like a pretty hefty round.

tom bri | August 26, 2007 6:27 PM | Reply

Looks fake to me. The relative size of the bullet looks weird compared to the size of for example the watermelon. Seems to me the bullet should look larger for the apple and smaller for the melon or the jug.

Bill | August 26, 2007 8:15 PM | Reply

Quite possibly they used different calibers for different items. I'm sure they were going for the most dramatic explosive effect. A .22 wouldn't make that water bottle explode like that. Heck, it probably wouldn't make the apple explode, either.

Mike Gordon | August 26, 2007 8:48 PM | Reply

All fake. The relative size of the bullet to the objects hit isn't correct, especially the watermelon. Also the speed of the bullet relative to the flying fragments of the objects shot at. All fake

Leave a comment