Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.6.2
Site Design by Sekimori

« Crime in Britain | Main | Tommorrow.... »

Dealer records and registration

Posted by David Hardy · 27 August 2007 09:27 AM

Red's Trading Post blog has some thoughts.

So does Clayton Cramer. For background, FFLs primarily rely on paper records (which have high potential for error, as a serial no. and other data is transcribed by hand), one factor in this being that ATF only allows computerized records if it has approved the software, and very few such systems have been approved. As Red's points out, the approved systems are by no means cheap. The reason for approval is, I assume to make sure that it's hard to go back and alter entries. I suspect the standard used is something close to "impossible to alter entries," which may be overly strict (you could alter hard copy at the cost of maybe an hour's work, remove the spiral binder, do a new handwritten page, substitute, restore binder, substitute new 4473, etc.).

1 Comment | Leave a comment

gattsuru | August 27, 2007 1:08 PM | Reply

It's not really possible to make computer copy impossible to alter. Hard drives and NAND media both can have previous writes overwritten with random data to the point where even military tech can't read the old information, and optical discs can be replaced. You can make the file system or media difficult to access (often at significant cost), but that really just makes it more appealing for hackers to find the pinouts and build the drivers.

The stuff worries me. Cramer might be right that it's only a third of the guns out there now, but it's still a lot. Every sale from an FFL, every handgun passing over state borders... a lot of them may very well have been sold privately past that point, but it doesn't help much when gun owner seems to be all it needs for a normal warrant to turn into a no-knock one.

Leave a comment