Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« One heck of a a good fellow checks out | Main | VA governor Kaine on gun laws »

Interesting article on US v. Miller

Posted by David Hardy · 22 May 2007 10:53 PM

Right here. Via Dave Kopel at the Volokh Conspiracy.

· Supreme Court caselaw

2 Comments | Leave a comment

Eric M. Larson | May 23, 2007 8:05 PM | Reply

There's a excellent public use compilation of the documents in the Miller case on the Internet at: http://www.titleii.com/BardwellOLD/miller_compilation.html

Rudy DiGiacinto | May 23, 2007 10:02 PM | Reply

I was not aware that The NRA had a hand in disarming law-abiding citizens. According to the Article the President of the NRA was all in favor of the NFA restrictions but later lobbied to opt out on handguns. With friends like that, who needs the Brady Campaign?

Leave a comment