Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Petition for rehearing in Parker v. DC | Main | PA puts warrants in the computer »

Penn & Teller: "gun control is b___ sh___"

Posted by David Hardy · 9 April 2007 07:35 PM

Streaming video here.

4 Comments | Leave a comment

Jerry in Detroit | April 10, 2007 2:15 PM | Reply

It's not bad but they miss two cogent points.

The archaic definition of "well-regulated" has nothing to do with laws or bureaucratic regulations. In the 1700s it meant smooth or well practiced.

The second is that according to the US Code, there is an organized militia, commonly the National Guard, and an unorganized militia; basicly anyone capable of bearing arms in defense of home & country. The ‘militia’ mentioned in the Second Amendment is you & me.

In modern parlance, the authors of the Second Amendment said that since proficient shooters are necessary to the defense of a free state, the right of the people to keep & bear arms shall not be infringed.

arpjoe | April 12, 2007 5:00 PM | Reply

I watched this online recently and thought it was well done.

Les | April 12, 2007 10:36 PM | Reply

I dunno, I think I like Penn's interpretation better than some of the others.

Ph47f3 | April 17, 2007 11:40 PM | Reply

I thought the show was pretty one-sided. They claimed to have two anti-gun advocates, and one dude in the middle. The only one they really excerpted though was the guy pushing for total elimination of guns. They filmed him in such a way to make him look flaky. The other anti-gun advocate got barely 3 sentences in. On the other side of the debate: two pro-gun people, one pro-gun business owner, and a man who thought he was George Washington.

They promoted the view they personally held. They didn't try to equitably present the facts.

Leave a comment