Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Texas gets "no retreat law" | Main | Webb staffer gun incident »

Sounds like a heck of a squad auto weapon

Posted by David Hardy · 28 March 2007 10:16 PM

A webpage for the Ultimax SAW. I'm happy to see American inventors trying their best, although politics too often matters more than good weapons design. It's amazing to reflect how many American military firearms are the result of individual inventors, or small firms... the government tends to struggle on with overly complex, overly expensive space-age tinkering, while individuals work on things that ... well, work. The last purely government design that I can think of is the M-1/M-14, and even that was the work of a brilliant individual, John Garand. And of course the Soviet AK-47 breakthru was the work of one bright tank officer who figured he could make a better gun than any in use.

Hat tip to reader Spiker for this link.

· shooting

11 Comments | Leave a comment

Alcibiades | March 28, 2007 11:23 PM | Reply

I suppose a lot of what hampers the government design process is red tape. They can't just "try it", they have to get approval up the command chain.

mike123 | March 29, 2007 6:53 AM | Reply

Don't forget Gaston Glock. His story is amazing.

Firehand | March 29, 2007 7:33 AM | Reply

Look at the output of John Browning: the 1917 and 1919 .30 caliber machineguns, the BAR, the 1911 pistol, the M2 Heavy machinegun. Not counting all the other firearms he designed.

The AR15 and Barret are from civilian designers, too.

Bill Twist | March 29, 2007 9:15 AM | Reply

And of course the Soviet AK-47 breakthru was the work of one bright tank officer who figured he could make a better gun than any in use.

By liberally copying from John Browning's work. The AK-47 is basically a gas-operated, select fire version of the John Browning designed long recoil operated Remington Model 8, with a few tweaks to make it more illiterate-peasant friendly.

Mike Murley | March 29, 2007 11:05 AM | Reply

The excellent Ultimax 100 not a US design, per se, though James Sullivan gets credit for its 'Constant Recoil' operation (which reduces recoil to almost nothing - it can be accurately fired one-handed). It is a 1980s-era deign from Chartered Industries of Singapore (now Singapore Technologies Kinetics).

Its in service with the Singapore Armed Forces (and the Jordanian 101 Special Forces Battalion, among others).

It was demonstrated to US Special Forces in 1984 (I have a picture of myself holding one with a suppressor in the summer of 1984).

It was submitted to the USMC SAW trials, but the Marines chose the Minimi (M249). The drum feed was the rumored reason why the Corps didn't like the Ultimax - the drums were originally to be issued loaded and to be disposable (though CIS demonstrated a drum loader at Fort Bragg for training ammunition purposes).

ST Kinetics marketing PDF - http://www.stengg.com/upload/194X9nI4kMKCDKfW7kd.pdf

Letalis | March 29, 2007 11:49 AM | Reply

Kokalis considers the Ultimax to be a fairly subpar weapon. Don't know myself.

The Mechanic | March 29, 2007 1:56 PM | Reply

I want one of those! Our senator, Feinstein had to quit the Military Appropriations Construction Committee. Story in World Net Daily http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54932

Kristopher | March 29, 2007 1:59 PM | Reply

Not impressed with them.

The M-240 ( FN-MAG ) is better than either of them.

Rivrdog | March 29, 2007 6:05 PM | Reply

OK weapon, poor caliber.

Mark | March 30, 2007 8:05 AM | Reply

I wish these were availible for sale to us of the unwashed masses... I guess I will never know whether it really is neat or not, since there probably arent any transferable examples around, and even if there were, trasnferable MGs are rather out of my budget anyway.

Brad | April 1, 2007 6:39 PM | Reply

Drum fed vs belt fed SAW

Interesting that Singapore and China prefer drum feed to belt fed SAW. The Chinese drum for the RPK is superior to the the Russian drum, since the Chinse drum can be loaded and stored with the spring unwound.

I think the RPK in 7.62x39 caliber is a good SAW. It may not have the sustained firepower of a belt-fed M-249, but the RPK is lighter, the ammunition is better suited to the SAW mission, the drum fed RPK is more resistant to foreign debris gumming up the works, and the selective-fire feature of the RPK can be used to conserve ammunition.

It seems to me the role of a SAW means it is moved more often than it is fired, unlike the role of a tripod mounted belt-fed weapon. So the portable and buttoned up design of the drum-fed RPK is better for the SAW mission than the heavier and more open design of the belt-fed M-249.

Leave a comment