Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Self defense against terrorist attack | Main | DC handgun ban stricken by DC Circuit »

Calif court supresses result of search based on NFA inspection

Posted by David Hardy · 8 March 2007 07:03 PM

Story here. Sounds as if the ATF inspectors checked his title II inventory, noticed he had non-NFA guns banned under the CA ban on "assault weapons," and alerted State authorities.

The court noted that there are statutory immunities regarding NFA information (put in place to prevent an argument that the amended NFA requires self-incrimination, as the Supremes had held the original NFA did require), and that (I think, the article is unclear) that includes information uncovered during inspection of an NFA dealer's inventory and records.

· National Firearms Act

5 Comments | Leave a comment

Keith R | March 9, 2007 7:53 AM | Reply

No criminal conviction, but I wonder if he got the 500 guns back.

Kristopher | March 9, 2007 3:20 PM | Reply

The "assault" weapons are still contraband.

If he now admits they are his, they may be usable as evidence again.

I would suggest moving out of state, and then suing for return of the NFA inventory.

Ninth Stage | March 9, 2007 8:27 PM | Reply

"Assault" weapons owned (and presumably registered) in CA before a certain date are grandfathered.

straightarrow | March 12, 2007 11:23 PM | Reply

Ninth Stage, I bought an SKS in Ca. that they now want surrendered and it isn't an assault weapon. Fortunately I didn't live there when I bought it and I don't live there now. Nor will I ever.

I was born there and escaped. I now live in America.

Mark | March 16, 2007 9:31 AM | Reply

The ATF agent who violated federal law (that was the wording used in the linked article anyway) needs to be put in jail.

Leave a comment