Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« The perils of a blind date | Main | LA Times on Castle Doctrine, No-Retreat Laws »

Utah shooting was in a "Gun Free Zone"

Posted by David Hardy · 17 February 2007 04:18 PM

John Lott has the evidence. The only thing that stopped the shooter was that the off-duty officer didn't follow the rules.

Via Gun Law News.

3 Comments | Leave a comment

OldeForce | February 18, 2007 12:35 AM | Reply

Posted this elsewhere: If you come across a mall, store, or office building with a restriction for concealed carry, send them a letter or email. The one I've used asks who my family contacts if I'm injured or killed when unable to defend myself. And that our lawyer has been told to start at $10 million and work up. Local chain had an apology back to me in under 36 hours; the signs came down, but they don't let employees carry. Understand that I wasn't the only one who went after them. My employer of 20+ years will fire you if you have a firearm locked in a box in the trunk of your car in the company parking lot or at a company-sponsored event. We've been told it's part of our employment contract. (And a co-worker was patted down, his cubicle stripped, and his car opened and turned out when a guard saw a set of hearing "muffs" in his car. No weapon, but he was warned about termination, anyway. I was threatened with termination for discussing a day at the range. Now I'm retired and won't step foot in any of our offices.

Unix-Jedi | February 19, 2007 8:36 AM | Reply

I've seen several people comment that that sign has no legal force (In Utah).

There's no provision for forbidding concealed weapons, so that demand is really a request, one that doesn't carry the force of law behind it.

But, even if it did, wouldn't the fabled HR 218 supercede it?

BobG | February 19, 2007 10:00 AM | Reply

The law says that if it is posted, and you have a weapon, you can be asked to leave. If you do not comply, you can be arrested for trespassing.

Leave a comment