Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.3
Site Design by Sekimori

« British experience | Main | Brady gets stung »

Mitt Romney's shifting positions

Posted by David Hardy · 16 February 2007 09:44 AM

National Review Online has a nice summary.

· Politics

2 Comments | Leave a comment

Justin | February 16, 2007 11:32 AM | Reply

In my opinion. Deroy's piece picks and chooses the evidence.

Here's some that he overlooked

Hyunchback | February 17, 2007 7:10 AM | Reply

Such a wonderful example of "truth". The campaign website.

The problem I have is that his phrasing is "off".

'Americans should have the right to own and possess firerarms...'

SHOULD HAVE? We have that right. It is the Second Amendment. There is no SHOULD about it.

Romney also only mentions owning and possession. Not carry or "bear".

Romney's own statement on his own campaign website is made up of weasel words. You can't blame the media for the fact that his position is NOT 100% in support of the Right Of The People.

The only candidates worthy of support are those who are unequivocating in their words AND deeds in upholding the 2nd Amendment.

Leave a comment