Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Thought re: crime rates | Main | Text of Ohio bill »

Minn: felon in possession of BB gun

Posted by David Hardy · 17 December 2006 04:12 PM

A Minnesota court has upheld a felon-in-possesion prosecution based on posession of a BB gun.

State laws defining "firearms" fall into several classes:

1. Track the federal rule, basically a cartridge-loading arm.

2. Or expels projectiles by action of an explosive (nevermind that smokeless powder is hardly an explosive, legislatures don't know that much), or

3. Expels a projectile by means of an expanding gas (which would include BB guns).

6 Comments | Leave a comment

RKM | December 17, 2006 4:55 PM | Reply

2. ... legislatures don't know that much...

They might have got it correct by accident. The smokeless powder is started by a primer that does contain an explosive. Even 22 CB caps that have no powder are launched by a primer.

Phanatic | December 17, 2006 5:45 PM | Reply

They did get it right, smokeless powder *is* an explosive. It's not a *high* explosive, but it's most certainly an explosive.

There's a difference between detonation and deflagration, yes, but even deflagration can result in an explosion.

htom | December 17, 2006 5:52 PM | Reply

After a lot of digging, the court found that a BB gun works by expanding gas. I suspect that a felon
had better not carry a soda straw and a wad of paper ....

http://www.courts.state.mn.us/opinions/coa/current/opa061170-1212.htm

Sebastian | December 17, 2006 10:11 PM | Reply

New Jersey legislates along the lines of three. People who played paintball had to lobby to get an exception made in the law to make paintball guns legal to own and possess in New Jersey without an FID. I believe airsoft pistols are still considered firearms, and thus require an FID. Better have an FID if you decide to have some fun with a potato cannon too.

karrde | December 19, 2006 5:17 PM | Reply

Strange.

In my home state (Michigan), there's an exemption from firearm status for "any smooth bore rifle or handgun designed an manufactured exclusively for propelling BB's not exceeding .177 calibre by means of spring, gas or air."

(Quoted from Firearm Laws of Michigan published by the State and given free to every recipient of a Concealed Carry permit.)

Glad to have that small detail straight.

Now, about home-made potato cannon...

Troy D. | July 11, 2009 4:58 AM | Reply

As long as you can get .177 cal potatos ;)

Leave a comment