Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Gunnies in Marin County | Main | Gene Volokh, common sense, and school shootings »

New Action sport

Posted by David Hardy · 3 October 2006 02:18 PM

I predict this will quickly replace skeet. (Streaming video file).

· shooting

6 Comments

Sebastian | October 3, 2006 10:14 PM

Looks a bit doctored to me :) I doubt I could hit a moving target with an anti-tank weapon on the first try, let alone hitting even a moving car twice firing from the hip with a shotgun.

Alcibiades | October 4, 2006 12:10 AM

I thought it was unusual for the machine gun to be producing small explosions. They would have had to have something explosive in the car for that to occur.

me | October 4, 2006 7:57 AM

True enough, gentlemen, but I don't care. Sign me up for that job.

Weerd Beard | October 6, 2006 2:04 PM

Yeah definetly looked a tad staged. Probably planted explosives in the car.

Still shooting the bastards is tons of fun! I bought my best friend's junker that he'd been too lazy to scrap, and me and 20 of my friends had a GRAND old time!
http://infinitearms.com/images2/v/shoots/mecar/

Arrrrrr

Nimrod45 | October 8, 2006 5:25 AM

I wanted to see what his grand finale was...

OldeForce | October 8, 2006 8:11 PM

Bad range manners: no eye or ear protection. And how would you like to have been his cameraman, standing behind him as he fired the anti-tank weapon. OT: heard he was badly injured in a car test, running at very high speed. Any info?