Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Self defense in Seattle | Main | Thoughts on DV cases »

More on Utah judge

Posted by David Hardy · 31 October 2006 12:05 PM

Bitter has a great posting on more dirt that's coming to light about the Utah judge who, well, went berserk and ordered a guy taken into custody because he dared to respond when she started arguing with him about the evils of hunting. It's pretty serious -- making an ex parte (private, without the other side being notified or involved) contact with a defense attorney, promising to reduce his client's sentence, and telling him not to let the prosecution know about the call. We're talking some grossly unethical judicial conduct here.

UPDATE: sorry, been so busy I thought I'd blogged the story before. Bitter at TheBitchGirls has been following it from the beginning. Here's what the judge did in the courtroom. Basically, starts a lecture on how sweet deer are and how terrible it is to hunt them, then when a spectator walks out, orders him brought back, starts to debate him, and when he answers politely has him seized and held in custody.

Here's her followup story, and here's another.

3 Comments | Leave a comment

BobG | October 31, 2006 12:32 PM | Reply

Most of us familiar with her plan on voting her out come election time; she has no business sitting on the bench with her mindset and attitudes. Basically she uses it as a captive audience for her BS and and place to push her opinions on others.

ben | October 31, 2006 2:16 PM | Reply

Do you have a link to the story involving the hunting argument?

RKM | October 31, 2006 6:40 PM | Reply

Ben-

Take a look at:

http://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=1060836&an=0&page=1#1060836

Leave a comment