Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Editorial attacking Florida laws | Main | Joyce Foundation wikipedia page »

Interesting 1866 case

Posted by David Hardy · 20 August 2006 05:48 PM

Thanks to a query from Don Kates, I found an issue of Case and Comment from the 1970s that cites a case of some historical interest.

In 1861, Tennessee's confederate government passed a bill that empowered the governor to designate persons in each county to round up all arms. Since it was a bill relating to a Department of Ordinance, I'd assume the purpose was to get arms for the military, although it might have been applied with more vigor to areas such as eastern TN, that weren't sympathetic to seccession. After the war's end, a fellow whose rifle was taken sued the person who took it, and won.

The state Supreme Court affirmed in Smith v. Ishenhour, 43 Tenn. 214 (1866). The court ruled that the statute had "utterly disregarded" the state constitution, which protected a right to keep and bears for the common defense. "This is the first attempt, in the history of the Anglo-Saxon race, of which we are apprised, to disarm the people by legislation." Accordingly, judgment for the plaintiff was affirmed.

· State legislation

1 Comment

Rivrdog | August 21, 2006 9:42 AM

So this means that since 1866, Tenneseeans have been protected against a 'Nawlins-type confiscation by judicial precedent?