Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Roger Sherman's version of the Second Amendment | Main | Geo. Mason's militia commission found »

"Well-regulated"

Posted by David Hardy · 28 July 2006 09:44 AM

Jon Roland's site has posted an interesting discussion of the meaning of "well-regulated." The cites from the Oxford English Dictionary span 1709 - 1894, and suggest "well-regulated" meant something close to "in proper working order."

(I think I've seen a 17th century usages in connection with troops, something about a city being lost to the enemy for want of a body of well-regulated troops in the area, implying that those in the region were ill-disciplined or disorganized). The use of an adjective with "militia" goes back at least to 1625, when Charles I announced he was striving for an "exact militia." To the extent that "militia" meant every man able to bear arms, just having a militia was meaningless ... every nation would have one of those, and "having people of military age is necessary to the security of a free state" might be true but rather obvious.

· Second Amendment wording

3 Comments | Leave a comment

Joe Towler | July 28, 2006 9:58 AM | Reply

I wonder if the term "well regulated" had to do with the weapons of the time. With the advent of digital watches, we have lost fact of the ticking of the well regulated clock. Flintlock rifles and muskets had a multi step method for charging the weapon. It was expected that a qualified gunner should be able to load and fire his musket three times a minute. Like clockwork. Those who could not were not qualified to be in the militia.

Best regards

Joe Towler | July 28, 2006 10:00 AM | Reply

I wonder if the term "well regulated" had to do with the weapons of the time. With the advent of digital watches, we have lost sight of the ticking of the "well regulated" clock. Flintlock rifles and muskets had a multi step method for charging the weapon. It was expected that a qualified gunner whould be able to load and fire his musket three times a minute. Like clockwork. Those who could not were not qualified to be in the militia.

Best regards

Daniel | July 28, 2006 12:14 PM | Reply

Though we're not loading flintlock muskets, it still takes training to operate a firearm proficently be it handgun or rifle. Sure a 15 year old kid from east LA can point and shoot, but it takes training and practice to be considered a well regulated militia.

Leave a comment