Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Carnival of cordite | Main | Brady v. NRA annual meetings »

Another municipal lawsuit

Posted by David Hardy · 15 May 2006 08:10 PM

New York City just filed one, against out of state FFLs, alleging that they were allowing straw purchases.

If they can prove that, they can probably invoke the exception to the gun mfrs' liability protection. I still see major barriers in terms of (a) duty (b) causation and (c) damages. Not to mention (d), standing. I mean -- if you can prove a dealer on a certain day was willing to make a strawman sale, does that prove he ever did so in the past? How many times? What crimes were caused or not caused?

As far as standing goes -- anyone who's ever tried to represent a cop or fireman suing a private individual for negligence that resulted in on-duty injuries runs afoul of the "fireman's rule" -- they can't sue, because running those rirks are part of their job. A city as a government is, I'd think, in an even weaker position.

UPDATE: most of the stories so far have just been paraphrases of the NYC press release. Here's one with a bit of detail. One interesting question is which judge got the case. If Jack Weinstein -- then the fix is in.

· Gun manufacturer liability

2 Comments

George | May 16, 2006 6:57 AM

You can see the video of the Press Conf. at http://www.nyc.gov/html/om/html/2006a/media/pc051506-ATF_presser300k.asx
The guy that sold the gun was breaking the law as far as I can tell. I don't see why all gun sellers don't start their sale buy just asking the question, "Is this gun for you or for someone else?"

What is not address is the fact that it is NY and NY City that is exporting crime to the other states and it is NY and NY City that is supplying the criminals who illegally buy and use the guns. Can someone sue NYC when they let a criminal get out of jail early or plea bargain a crime down to nothing and then the criminal commits another crime.

Flight-ER-Doc | May 16, 2006 1:45 PM

What about the crime committed by the person, not an agent of the government with jurisdiction (ie, a civilian), who actually MADE the purchase? And the conspiracy between the two NY goons, and the people in NYC who authorized their little junket?

Lets lock up those clowns, too.