Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Justice Scalia on firearms | Main | Move to make ATFE director subject to Senate confirmation »

NJ Assn sues NY port authority over abuse of gunowner

Posted by David Hardy · 27 February 2006 08:15 AM

The Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs, Inc. has sued the NY & NJ Port Authority (which administers the airports around there) over the false arrest of a Utah gunowner.

Basically, Gregg Revell was scheduled on a flight from Salt Lake City to Allentown, PA, connecting in Newark, NJ (which is near NYC). He possessed a firearm in conformance with the 1986 Firearm Owners' Protection Act (which allows a person to take a firearm interstate if it is legal where the journey begins and ends and it is unloaded and secured along the way). Due to airline error, he missed the connection in Newark, and the airline required him to claim his baggage there. When he tried to check in again, and declared the firearm as required by FAA regulation, he was arrested under the local gun laws and spent five days in a hellhole of an NJ jail (where friendly inmates told him that his life was in danger -- the real thugs might just kill him for the fun of it).

· General con law

2 Comments | Leave a comment

jug | February 28, 2006 6:47 AM | Reply

Makes me puke. And to think we are killing them in Iraq to bring them this same crap. Officers should be fired and officials heads should roll.

wrangler5 | March 1, 2006 5:27 PM | Reply

I've posted on this subject elsewhere but will repeat my thoughts here: I think the damage claim should be made as large as is even remotely allowable under state law (if accident victims can sue for hundreds of times their maximum lifetime earnings, this kind of intentional, official outrage deserves at least as much.) And it should be directed not only against the official agencies involved but also each "law enforcement" individual even peripherally involved.

If the litigation is successful, collection of damages should be pursued to the maximum extent possible against the individuals involved, to the point of personal bankruptcy, if possible. The purpose of this tactic would be to demonstrate to the "law enforcement" community that there are consequences to trampling on the constitutional rights of citizens, and that they cannot hide behind the "just following orders" excuse.

I'm not a tort lawyer, so there may be defenses that individual cops can raise against personal liability. But I think there are exceptions and limits to the "offical duty" sorts of defenses, and this is the sort of case that might be the place to start exploring those limits. For example, if a chief ordered his cops to confiscate Bibles whenever they saw one in a car they stopped, would any reasonable person believe the individual cops ought to escape personal liability on some "official duty" or "following orders" defense? I don't think so - cops are citizens too, and should be held to the same "presumed to know the law" standard that they apply against the citizenry.

Leave a comment