Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Poll on NRA, other groups | Main | More on NYC cooking crime statistics »

Congressional Research Service lights fire under NFA registry

Posted by David Hardy · 29 December 2005 08:08 PM

The Congressional Research Service has issued a lengthy study (pdf) of the NFA registration system, and it's a scorcher. Understand that search warrants, raids, and convictions are based upon negative reports from this system, which are used to establish that an NFA weapon (full auto, or short barrelled shotgun or rifle) is not registered, so the sytem should be perfect or very near perfect. According to the report, it's far from that.

Questions about its accuracy have been raised since the 1970s. (pp. 1-2). Treasury's Inspector General found significant problems in 1998, including improper destruction of records, inaccuracies, and failure to follow procedure. But the IG did not examine legal issue of whether problems were sufficient to call into question certifications that guns were not registered. (p. 2).

The GCA 68 provided an amnesty period for registrations, and they flooded in, overwhelming the staff. As a result records were fouled up, wrong serial numbers recorded, records misfiled (no computers then, so a paper in the wrong file might go missing forever). (p. 4)

A 1975 internal ATF document refers to "continuously" finding errors in the system, and raises the worry that an innocent person might be convicted as a result, if he had lost his own copy of the registration. (p.6).

In 1996, John LeaSure was convicted of six counts of possessing unlicensed machineguns. His attorney, Jim Jeffiries, obtained a copy of an ATF training tape in which the fellow in charge of NFA registrations told agents that the database was flawed, but that his people would always testify that it was perfect. Informed of a partial transcript of the tape, the judge set aside five of the six counts. (p. 7) [Here's a previous posting that includes video of the training tape.

Actual accuracy is unknown. It was claimed to be 1.5%, but a 1998 Treasury Inspector General study found it was higher, based on samplings -- strangely, the report does not give the actual number, and the IG declined to study larger samples. (p.9)

The accuracy may be esp. problematic for DEWATS, deactivated war trophies. (p. 10)

A MAJOR set of criticisms of Treasury Inspector General responses to inquiries about accuracy. (pp. 11-15).

An examination of how an amnesty could be used to try to make the system accurate, and how it could be structured. (pp. 16-18)

· National Firearms Act

2 Comments | Leave a comment

GLN Admin | December 29, 2005 10:30 PM | Reply

It has been a bad year for the BATFE. In October the CRS came out with a report relative to HR1603. If you haven't seen it, take a look at HR1603

Paul | January 1, 2006 10:44 AM | Reply

Here's my amnesty suggestion. All NFA firearms for which tax cannot be shown to be paid by either the BATFE or the owner shall be made legal by the payment of the appropriate tax, at which point a new record exists.

The Federal Government shall be prohibited from simultaneously requiring a tax and refusing to collect said tax, then prosecuting for non-payment of the tax.

While I realize this is still disrespectful of the Second Amendment, I believe it would be a good first step.

Leave a comment