Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Prof. Kleck's latest studies on self-defense | Main | Joyce Malcolm's article on arms and genocide »

Changes to Texas law on firearms

Posted by David Hardy · 27 August 2005 07:52 PM

Just rec'd an email on this, haven't verified online yet. As I recollect, Texas had a rather strange legal regime until recently. Possession and ownership were OK, but it was illegal to "habitually carry" a handgun. Exactly what was "habitual" was up to the courts, but it presumably did not mean carrying for a specific shooting trip, and did mean carrying all the time for self-defense. Anyway:

HB 322,
Categories: Concealed carry. Status: Filed 01/06/05. Signed 6/17/05,
effective September 1, 2005.
Relating to concealed handgun licenses for members and veterans of
the United States armed forces.
Extends eligibility for a CHL to members or veterans of the United
States armed forces age 18 or older, including a member or veteran of
the reserves or national guard. Provides an extension of the license
for one year to members or veterans serving outside the US. Cuts
license fees in half for service members or veterans.

HB 823, Categories: Concealed carry. Status: Filed 02/03/05. Signed
6/16/05, effective September 1, 2005.
Relating to an exception to the application of the offense of
unlawful carrying of weapons.
Legalizes carrying a handgun for self-defense without a CHL while
travelling in a privately owned motor vehicle. This is an expansion
of rights, but it may result in a drop in the number of concealed
handgun licensees as those who want to carry only in their car drop
out. As amended, the law requires the handgun be concealed.

· contemporary issues

5 Comments | Leave a comment

Nightgaunt | August 27, 2005 8:45 PM | Reply

I am not a lawyer, but I did my best to check out exactly what HB823 does, and I had a post on it last month.

http://blogonomicon.blogspot.com/2005/06/some-hb823-details.html

r | August 29, 2005 10:48 AM | Reply

Hmmm,

IIRC this created open season on carjackers, plus they removed the tagging requirements.

drags, they require the heater to be concealed. oh well,

in english, the law says your ride is part of your domicle so while travelling (presumed to be in your car or a motor vehicle) you have a common law right to carry heat and that is a thing not subject to 'officer' or 'court' interpretation.

another blow on the old Jim Crow gun laws in TX yea!

r

John | August 29, 2005 2:07 PM | Reply

What 823 did was put the burden of proof on the prosecutor to establish that you were not "travelling". TX law has always had an exemption to unlawfully carrying a weapon for people who were "traveling". Problem is there never has been and still is not a definition of what exactly travelling is.

Mark | August 31, 2005 12:48 AM | Reply

I thought this clarification was a great idea, but I see some people intend to ignore it:


" 'It is still going to be against the law for (unlicensed) persons to carry handguns in autos,' Harris County District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal said Monday"


http://www.click2houston.com/news/4913538/detail.html

Phelps | September 1, 2005 12:27 PM | Reply

Sounds OK to me. Houston has too much money in the coffers, and it is time they pay some of it back to the citizens via wrongful arrest lawsuits.

Leave a comment