Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home

Ghillie Suits and Gear

Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Survival Tips : The Survivalist Blog
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Piers Morgan, a gunny? | Main | At least the story had a happy ending »

The type of law that makes me want to pull my hair out...

Posted by David Hardy · 21 January 2013 10:19 AM

Except that I don't have any hair.

Arizona Revised Statutes ยง13-3101(A). Definitions. In this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:

3. "Explosive" means any dynamite, nitroglycerine, black powder, or other similar explosive material, including plastic explosives. Explosive does not include ammunition or ammunition components such as primers, percussion caps, smokeless powder, black powder and black powder substitutes used for hand loading purposes.

OK, so explosive means black powder except that it doesn't mean black powder.

4. "Firearm" means any loaded or unloaded handgun, pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun or other weapon that will expel, is designed to expel or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive.

And firearm means anything that expels a projectile by action of an "explosive." But (3) tells us that ammunition and smokeless or black powder is not an "explosive." So what is a firearm?

Comments

At this rate, I wonder how badly they botched the statutory definition of "projectile".

Posted by: Mman at January 21, 2013 04:50 PM

Just like the failure to allow for law enforcement weapons in New York's latest overreach.

The world would be a better place if legislators understood their abysmal ignorance on any number of subjects and didn't try to micromanage that which they fail to understand.

Posted by: Bill at January 21, 2013 05:53 PM

I looks like they *tried* to leave "black powder used for hand loading" out of the explosive definition -- C for effort. But the big contradiction? Er... Making guns vanish via paradox?

Posted by: Roberta X at January 21, 2013 09:01 PM

Dave, I just forwarded this to the AzCDL. Perhaps we can fix it this year!

Posted by: Tom Woodrow at January 22, 2013 12:27 PM

Dave,

This just in;

See HB 2234 http://www.azcdl.org/html/bill_tracking.html


Tom Woodrow

Posted by: Tom Woodrow at January 22, 2013 12:47 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)