Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home
Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
TheSurvivalistBlog.net
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Survivalist Blog
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Deer-auto collisions | Main | NRA birthday »

Suit by Georgia Carrying member

Posted by David Hardy · 17 November 2008 07:07 AM

Fellow is carrying openly, with result that people across the street phone in a "man with a gun" report. In these parts the deputies would ask what make, is he selling, and what price does he want. They weren't so understanding, tho, and arrested him for CCW and disturbing the peace by causing people to be alarmed (which is a bit inconsistent: how could anyone be alarmed if it wasn't visible?). The prosecutors at least had some sense and refused to file. Data here.

Comments

Only a matter of time before this happens to my brother or myself, I'm afraid.

Posted by: JustinGA at November 17, 2008 09:08 AM

Interesting, In Ohio, the police cannot legally (although they probably do) use open carry as an excuse for an inducing panic charge. Sometimes it simply requires reminding the local police chief of head of public safety about this. Since we've had some revision to the concealed carry laws, this may have taken place.

Posted by: Roger at November 17, 2008 12:39 PM

I should mention that I live in the county where this happened (Paulding County) but not the city. However, most of the police in this county are fairly reasonable and understanding about people carrying firearms. Mr. Hardy is quite correct.

Posted by: JustinGA at November 17, 2008 01:28 PM

It's obtrusive. It's slow. It's costly.

But this is how we build precendent, and teach these zealots the meaning of "shall not be infringed."

Posted by: Carl in Chicago at November 17, 2008 01:52 PM

Would it help if you're planning to carry openly to send a letter to the local law enforcement agencies requesting that they notify ALL their officers that open carry is legal and not a justification for a disorderly conduct charge? Ask for confirmation that the commanders have informed the deputies and get more persistent if they don't get back to you. If they refuse to inform the deputies then at least that would make for a much stronger lawsuit. Better yet, get the 911 operators trained to tell "man with a gun" callers that it is legal so the cops don't even have to bother you or waste their time.

Posted by: Critic at November 17, 2008 01:59 PM

911 operators shold ask "man with gun" callers what the "man" is doing. Is he walking down the street talking with the neighbors while drinking a cup of coffee or skulking outside the 7-11 wearing a ski mask?

Posted by: Tom at November 17, 2008 04:09 PM

Forget getting the sheriff to acknowledge your right to do so. I went to our county sheriff about five years ago and just asked him what the law of this state says about open carry and what if anything do his deputies do about it.

I already knew the answer to the first question, OC is legal here, but has so many restrictions as to be almost a prohibition. However, it is in the strictly legal sense allowed. Even though I knew the answer I could never get an answer from the First Deputy, to whom I was talking. He kept saying "We discourage open carry." And I would ask, "But is it legal?" To which he would repeat his reply. Never did answer the question. Nor the next one, which was "Just how do you discourage open carry?" Got the same non-answer.

I thanked him for his time and asked if honest work didn't agree with him, since he sure as Hell didn't believe in it.

Posted by: straightarrow at November 17, 2008 04:18 PM

I really can't understand how these "law enforcement" officers sleep at night. They should be behind bars for a few days for this one. Jackboots be damned, fired and incarcerated. We cannot, should not and will not tolerate this abuse. They will not slowly chip away, stack the salami or grind this stone down.

Carl is exactly right; if this is the only way to get "shall not be infringed" drilled into their heads, so be it.

Posted by: Zach at November 19, 2008 12:11 AM

This type of behaviour should be discouraged. By filing this lawsuit a clear message should be sent to law enforcement that whether they like it or not. Properly credentials civilians are LEGAL to carry guns. The best way to hit them is in the wallet.

Posted by: Archangel at November 21, 2008 09:00 AM

or just pat them in the face with a shovel

Posted by: straightarrow at November 22, 2008 10:55 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)