Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home
Get an autographed copy of our Heller brief! $7.99 incl. S&H
Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Joyce Foundation wikipedia page | Main | Gun law session in PA »

New briefs in Parker case (challenge to DC law)

Posted by David Hardy · 21 August 2006 06:33 PM

Here's a webpage with almost all of the briefs filed in the Parker appeal, including the recently-filed reply brief. There are a few amici briefs still being added.

The States' amicus included Idaho, and is antigun. Idaho has since withdrawn itself from participation in the brief.

[Update: in light of comments, the last may be an error. I'd received the page from a pro-gun attorney, who noted something to the effect that Idaho had seen the error of its ways and withdrew. There may have been a mistake as to what brief was being referred to -- I assumed Idaho was on the State's brief]

Comments

There's no link.

Posted by: Kevin P. at August 21, 2006 09:02 PM

Thanks for the post pointing to the Parker case webpage. Very interesting.

One question, tho. You state in your post, "The States' amicus included Idaho, and is antigun." I skimmed thru the link from the main Parker page entitled, "States' Amicus Brief," and I certainly didn't get "antigun" out of it. I didn't read the whole thing, word-for-word, but up front it contains the following, "...the categorical nature of the D.C. Code provisions at issue here, which impose blanket prohibitions on handgun ownership and possession of functional long guns in the home, are fundamentally inconsistent with the Second Amendment right of Americans to keep and bear arms. As such, they are unconstitutional on their face."

So I am a bit confused by your comment? Are you referring to some other States' brief?

elb

Posted by: Eric at August 28, 2006 05:42 PM