Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« George Mason Univ. Symposium, pt. 3 | Main | GMU Symposium, part one »

GMU conference, part two

Posted by David Hardy · 9 October 2006 03:40 PM

Par two led off with Larry Keane, general counsel to National Shooting Sports Foundation. His focus was on firearms liability litigation after enactment of the Lawful Commerce in Firearms act. Basically, most of the city suits against gun manufacturers were dismissed, and arguments that the statute was unconstitutional were rejected. The one exception was, surprise, assigned to Judge Weinstein of EDNY. The Act has an exception for a dealer who violates laws specifically applicable to gun dealers and makers. It was plainly aimed at GCA 68 and state gun laws. Weinstein found instead that the NY statutes on "nuisance" came within the exception and so his suit could go ahead.

He was followed by Richard Gardiner, a Fairfax VA attorney who pretty much specializes in defending against ATFE revocations. The standard pattern in these is ... well, between bound book and 4473, there are about 40 items to fill in or check off per gun. So even if you get the human error rate down to 1%, there would be one error per 2.5 guns sold. ATF audits the books, finds lots of errors, gives warning. It comes back in a year or two later, finds lots of errors, and files to revoke the license.

He noted that sometimes the errors claimed are things not required by regulation. One dealer got cited for a person who filled in the 4473 question "have you ever been convicted" etc. with "never," ATF claimed the proper answer was yes or no. He pointed out the regulations say the question must be answered, and the gun cannot be transferred if it is yes. But nothing in the regs say the answer must be "no" and not "never."

Leave a comment