Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Debate on Saul Cornell's "A Well Regulated Militia" | Main | Senate passes limit on gun confiscation during disasters »

Thought for Friday

Posted by David Hardy · 14 July 2006 09:21 AM

It's interesting that in the second amendment context we have a LOT of data about how the Framers felt ... because the issue came down to nuts and bolts distribution of power in its clearest form. Debates in the ratifying conventions, state demands for a bill of rights, debates in the First House, motions in the First Senate, newspaper articles. Federalist 46, Madison arguing you can ratify the constitution without worry, because the militia will outnumber and can overpower any try at tyranny.

In the first amendment context we have much less information. Freedom of speech and press -- we have some statements about it being important in the abstract. It was not a big issue in the ratifying convention debates. Pat Henry and Geo. Mason didn't go to town on how the Congress might establish a religion or suppress publications. I suppose they figured that if the people were armed (or armed and organized) all other freedoms would follow.

The other provisions -- I can't remember a mention of search and seizure or self-incrimination in debates of the period. Ditto for self-incrimination, jury trial in civil cases, taking of property without compensation, etc.

Leave a comment