Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.3
Site Design by Sekimori

« Lumbee Indian resistance to Klan | Main | Military procurement »

Wyoming sues ATFE

Posted by David Hardy · 11 May 2006 11:47 AM

Via Alphecca comes this AP story of a lawsuit filed by Wyoming.

The Lautenberg amendment bans gun possession by persons convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence. The 1986 amendments to the Gun Control Act (some of which I drafted, long story) provide that a conviction is not a conviction if it has been expunged or set aside or rights have been restored (unless the order doing so, or the State law, provides that it does not restore firearm rights).

The local ATFE (this is the only case I've heard of it happening, so I think it's a local position) took the position that a conviction is not "expunged" unless its effects are entirely wiped out. Wyoming, like most states with expungement proceedings, doesn't really wipe them out -- the order says that they are, but in fact they can be used to enhance sentences in case of a second offense.

I think the local ATFE is in error here. Most expungement statutes work in the way the Wyoming one does. And the statute also recognizes restorations of civil rights (voting, etc., in the case of felonies) that do not affect the conviction at all. It's hard to see why Congress would have wanted a provision to apply in the case of a felony but not in the case of a misdemeanor. I suspect the US Attorney will roll over on it, but if not, the case might pose some interesting Second Amendment issues as well. After all, even the collective rights approach agrees that a State could raise the issue....

· prohibitted persons

Leave a comment